Cited by 37Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Advantages and disadvantages of one-stage and two-stage surgery for arrhythmias and Ebstein's anomaly

Bockeria, Leo, Golukhova, Elena, Dadasheva, Madina, Revishvili, Amiran, Levant, Alexander, Bazaev, Viacheslav, Rzaev, Farkhat, Kakuchaya, Tea·2005·European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of one-step and two-step surgery approach in patients with arrhythmias combined with Ebstein's anomaly. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with Ebstein's anomaly combined with tachyarrhythmias (58.5% men, 41.5% women, mean age 21.6+/-10.7 years) were operated on. In group A (32 patients), one-step surgical correction (simultaneous intraoperative elimination of arrhythmias and congenital heart defect repair) was performed, whereas in group B (21 patients), two-step surgery was performed with initial elimination of arrhythmogenic substrate by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation (first step) and following surgical repair of congenital heart defect (second step). RESULTS: In group A, total hospital mortality was 3.1% (1 patient) due to initial severe condition of this patient. One-step surgery was effective in 93.5% of cases. Mortality was not observed in group B. Efficacy of transcatheter radiofrequency ablation was 76.2%. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage and two-stage surgery of arrhythmias and Ebstein's anomaly are highly effective. First step of surgery of combined pathology reduces cardiopulmonary bypass time, complications and mortality while performing the second step of congenital heart defect surgery. However, simultaneous approach (one-step surgery) is better in terms of arrhythmia elimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.047

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bockeria, L., Golukhova, E., Dadasheva, M., Revishvili, A., Levant, A., Bazaev, V., Rzaev, F., & Kakuchaya, T.
Affiliations
Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
Bockeria, Leo
Venue
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Published
2005-10
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
536-540
ISSN
1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131253804
Cited by
37
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
Ebstein's anomaly, tachyarrhythmias, single-stage surgery, two-stage surgery, radiofrequency ablation, postoperative mortality, cardiopulmonary bypass time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Child, Ebstein Anomaly, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Tachycardia, Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review