Cited by 96Radiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsParticle Detector Development and Performance

Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET

Open access
Surti, Suleman, Karp, Joel S.·2020·Physica Medica

Abstract

This paper provides an update on time-of-flight (TOF) PET with a focus on latest hardware developments leading to current commercial PET/CT instruments. We describe advances in scintillator development, new photosensors and associated electronics readout, and detector designs for utilization in complete systems. Next, we introduce the latest commercial PET/CT scanners based on the aforementioned technologies, and discuss the detector design choices made that are relevant to differences in the system performance. Finally, we end with a discussion of the latest performance benchmarks for improved timing in PET detectors, challenges in scaling this performance to a complete system, and the outlook towards achieving a sub-50 ps coincidence timing resolution (CTR) in a PET detector.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.031

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMT), silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) in recently developed PET/CT scanners are smaller, provide up to 100% coverage of the scintillation crystal surface, and offer high photon sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution.

    “Compared to conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMT), silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) in recently developed PET/CT scanners are smaller, provide up to 100% coverage of the scintillation crystal surface and offer high photon sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution [44].”

    From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A SiPM system with low relative coverage (<60%) and 382 ps timing resolution can have similar or slightly inferior sensitivity to a bismuth germanate (BGO) PMT scanner with similar axial FOV (20.8 vs. 23.3 cps/kBq).

    “If, for example, a SiPM system with low relative coverage of <60% and a modest timing resolution of 382 ps [44,45] is compared to a bismuth germanate (BGO) PMT scanner with similar axial FOV length [46], the SiPM system’s sensitivity can be similar or even slightly inferior (20.8 vs. 23.3 cps/kBq) [45].”

    From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]Gariod R, Allemand R, Cormoreche E, Laval M, Moszynski M. The “LETI” positron tomograph architecture and time-of-flight improvements. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Time-of-Flight Emission Tomography Washington University, St. Louis, MO1982 p. 25– 9.
  2. [4]Wong WH, Mullani NA, Philippe EA, Hartz RK, Bristow D, Yerian K, Performance characteristics of the University of Texas TOF PET-I Camera. J Nucl Med. 1984; 25: 46– 7.
  3. [16]Li X, Qi W, Miyahara M, Kolthammer J. Performance Characterization of an SiPM-based Time-of-Flight Canon PET/CT Scanner. J Nucl Med. 2020; 61: 14.
  4. [25]Spurrier MA, Szupryczynski P, Kan Y, Carey AA, Melcher CL. Effects of Ca2+ Co-Doping on the Scintillation Properties of LSO:Ce. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008; 55: 1178– 82.
  5. [30]Spurrier MA, Szupryczynski P, Yang K, Carey AA, Melcher CL. Effects of Ca2+ Co-Doping on the Scintillation Properties of LSO:Ce. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008; 55: 1178– 82.
  6. [31]Blahuta S, Yang K, Ouspenski V, Menge P. Perfromance engineering of LYSO single crystals. 2016 IEEE Nucelar Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference Strasbourg, France 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surti, S., & Karp, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Surti, Suleman
  • Karp, Joel S.
Venue
Physica Medica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
80
Pages
251-258
ISSN
1120-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3105602151
Cited by
96
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physica Medica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
Keywords
time-of-flight PET, PET/CT scanner, scintillator development, photodetectors, detector design, coincidence time resolution
MeSH terms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Electronics, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review