Endometriosis, dysmenorrhea and diet—What is the evidence?
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the literature concerning the effect of diet on endometriosis and dysmenorrhea and to elucidate evidential support, to give dietary recommendations to women suffering from these conditions. A systematic search in electronic databases on a relationship between diet and endometriosis/dysmenorrhea was performed. Data on diet and endometriosis were limited to four trials of which two were animal studies. The articles concerning human consumption found some relation between disease and low intake of vegetable and fruit and high intake of vegetarian polyunsaturated fat, ham, beef and other red meat. Results concerning fish intake were not consistent. Eight trials of different design, with a total of 1097 women, investigated the relationship between diet and dysmenorrhea. Intake of fish oil seemed to have a positive effect on pain symptoms. This study concludes that literature on diet and endometriosis is sparse, whereas eight studies have looked at diet and dysmenorrhea. No clear recommendations on what diet to eat or refrain from to reduce the symptoms of endometriosis can be given, while a few studies indicate that fish oil can reduce dysmenorrhea. Further research is recommended on both subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diet plausibly has a role in the etiology of endometriosis through effects at various levels including on steroid hormones; however, few published studies have examined diet and endometriosis risk, resulting in no clear consensus recommendations.
“Diet plausibly has a role in the etiology of endometriosis through effects at various levels including on steroid hormones; however, few published studies have examined diet and endometriosis risk, 52 resulting in no clear consensus recommendations.”
From Defining Future Directions for Endometriosis Research: Workshop Report From the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Montpellier, France (2013) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Fjerbæk, A., & Knudsen, U. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Knudsen, Ulla B.
- ORCID
- Knudsen, Ulla B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 140-147
- ISSN
- 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 0301-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2029887836
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, diet, dietary recommendations, fish oil, polyunsaturated fatty acids, red meat consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, fish consumption
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis, Female, Fish Oils, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review