First trimester serum biomarkers to predict gestational diabetes in a high-risk cohort: Striving for clinically useful thresholds
Open accessAbstract
Objectives Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) has been a source of controversy. The prevalence has increased in line with an obesity epidemic and a trend towards delayed child-bearing. Treatment of even modest glycaemic impairment in pregnancy has been shown to be beneficial in preventing its clinical sequalae. However the cumbersome nature and timing of the oral glucose tolerance test coupled with debate around universal versus risk factor based screening have been problematic. This group aimed to investigate a panel of biomarkers which have shown promise in the literature to predict GDM from the first trimester in a group of high risk women. Methods Serum samples were drawn on 248 women deemed at risk of GDM before 15 weeks' gestation to measure C-reactive protein, sex hormone binding globulin, adiponectin and 1,5 anhydroglucitol. Patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test as per IADPSG criteria at 28 weeks' gestation. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the link between incidence of GDM and early pregnancy serum biomarkers. Results Adiponectin levels in the first trimester are independently linked to the risk of GDM. Serum adiponectin <8.9 μg/ml gives an odds ratio of 3.3 for GDM.Mean 1,5 AG levels are significantly lower in those that go on to develop GDM. SHBG levels measured in the first trimester were linked to the risk of GDM. However, this was no longer statistically significant once BMI, ethnicity and family history were taken into consideration. First trimester measurement of CRP is not a useful indicator of GDM risk. Conclusions First trimester measurement of Adiponectin and 1,5 Anhydroglucitol are potential early biomarkers for the later onset of GDM. Risk stratification using these biomarkers may facilitate early diagnosis and management of GDM to mitigate against its complications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The greatest hopes for markers of GDM occurrence are connected with afamine, adiponectin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol.
“The greatest hopes are connected with afamine, adiponectin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol [34,35].”
From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes
Crowther, C. A., Hiller, J. E., Moss, J. R., McPhee, A. J., Jeffries, W. S., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042973 · Cited by 3,159 · see citing works
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes
Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Casey, B., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0902430 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
Lorenzo-Almorós, A., Hang, T., Peiró, C., Soriano-Guillén, L., Egido, J., Tuñón, J., & Lorenzo, Ó. (2019) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-019-0935-9 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review
Modzelewski, R., Stefanowicz-Rutkowska, M. M., Matuszewski, W., & Bandurska-Stankiewicz, E. M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11195736 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Lorenzo-Almorós, A., Hang, T., Peiró, C., Soriano-Guillén, L., Egido, J., Tuñón, J., & Lorenzo, Ó. (2019) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-019-0935-9 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
- Authors
- Corcoran, S. M., Achamallah, N., Loughlin, J. O., Stafford, P., Dicker, P., Malone, F. D., & Breathnach, F.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Rotunda Hospital (IE)
- Dublin Institute of Technology (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Corcoran, Siobhan M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 222
- Pages
- 7-12
- ISSN
- 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 0301-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2782427223
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arrow.tudublin.ie
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- The Friends of the Rotunda Charity
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, first-trimester serum biomarkers, adiponectin, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, sex hormone-binding globulin, C-reactive protein, high-risk pregnancy, risk stratification, early diagnosis, oral glucose tolerance test, IADPSG criteria, biomarker thresholds
- MeSH terms
- Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Deoxyglucose, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Ireland, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimesters, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Incidence, Diabetes, Gestational, Early Diagnosis, Adiponectin, Maternal Serum Screening Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review