Cited by 39Reproductive tract infections researchReproductive Health and TechnologiesProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Probiotic therapy in couples with infertility: A systematic review

Corbett, GA, Crosby, DA, McAuliffe, FM·2021·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

The reproductive microbiome is becoming increasingly recognised for its influence on fertility. While there has been much work to investigate the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and disordered microbiomes in optimizing outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), the role of routinely prescribed probiotics is yet to be established. The therapeutic potential of probiotic therapy remains an exciting opportunity in ART and this review endeavours to summarise its evidence to date. A systematic review of MEDLINE (Pubmed), Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane database was performed on 7th May 2019, and repeated on 26th August 2019. The search was built using the terms 'subfertility;' 'probiotic therapy;' 'clinical pregnancy rate' and 'assisted reproductive outcomes.' The primary outcome was change in clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included improvements in male and female fertility parameters and microbial assessment. The initial search found 882 articles, of which 26 full manuscripts were reviewed. Four articles were eligible for inclusion. Of the two studies that reported the primary outcome, only one study found probiotics increased the clinical pregnancy rate non-significantly (48.0%-58.8%, p = 0.47). It also found higher miscarriage rate (30 % vs 16.6 %, p = 0.47) in the group treated with probiotics. Both studies on males with oral probiotic found significantly improved sperm motility. While benefit in sperm motility h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.054

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corbett, G., Crosby, D., & McAuliffe, F.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
256
Pages
95-100
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W3095038533
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
probiotics, infertility, couples, assisted reproduction, reproductive microbiome, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage, sperm motility, oral probiotics, bacterial vaginosis, subfertility
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Pregnancy, Sperm Motility, Pregnancy Rate, Probiotics, Live Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review