Meeting the ongoing needs of survivors of rarer cancer
Abstract
With more treatment options for people with cancer long-term survivorship is increasing. Physical and psycho-social needs have been identified in survivors of common cancers but very little has been written about the needs of patients with rarer cancers. Patients treated for rarer cancer are discharged to the primary health care team (PHCT), yet little is known about the assessment, management and support of these patients. Thirty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with (1) survivors of and (2) people living with rarer cancer (i.e. <5% of cancer burden). Participants were asked about physical and psycho-social needs and service provision. Data were analysed thematically using Atlas ti. Contrary to expectation, disease-free survivors of rarer cancer were indistinguishable from those living with disease in their ability to cope, and range of symptoms and needs. Participants with a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) reported that they were well supported on their return home and their needs were met. Participants without a CNS were referred to the PHCT who were unsure how to assess or support them. These participants felt abandoned. There is a need for the rehabilitation of patients with rarer cancer to strengthen individual coping mechanisms, and family and social support. Although there are resource and training implications, this is a potential role for the PHCT, district nursing in particular, and may lead to more focused and targeted provision of services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations, social isolation and stigmatization, and emotional distress.
“The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations (movements, pain, sleep problems, attention or concentration problems that affect daily life), [3–9], social isolation and stigmatization [3, 7, 9–13], and emotional distress (anger, depression, anxiety, hopelessness, loss, lack of control, abandonment) [3, 5, 8, 14–17].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Griffiths, J., Willard, C., Burgess, A., Amir, Z., & Luker, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- The Christie Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Jane
- Venue
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 434-441
- ISSN
- 1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121828195
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Macmillan Cancer Support
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, long-term survivorship, primary care, clinical nurse specialists, district nursing, psychosocial needs, physical needs, rehabilitation, coping, family and social support, post-treatment care, service delivery
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aftercare, Attitude to Health, Continuity of Patient Care, England, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Nurse Clinicians, Oncology Nursing, Patient Discharge, Primary Health Care, Public Health Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Survivors, Disease-Free Survival, Needs Assessment, Nurse's Role, Rare Diseases, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review