Cited by 24Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifePalliative and Oncologic Care

Meeting the ongoing needs of survivors of rarer cancer

Griffiths, Jane, Willard, Carole, Burgess, Andrea, Amir, Ziv, Luker, Karen·2007·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

With more treatment options for people with cancer long-term survivorship is increasing. Physical and psycho-social needs have been identified in survivors of common cancers but very little has been written about the needs of patients with rarer cancers. Patients treated for rarer cancer are discharged to the primary health care team (PHCT), yet little is known about the assessment, management and support of these patients. Thirty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with (1) survivors of and (2) people living with rarer cancer (i.e. <5% of cancer burden). Participants were asked about physical and psycho-social needs and service provision. Data were analysed thematically using Atlas ti. Contrary to expectation, disease-free survivors of rarer cancer were indistinguishable from those living with disease in their ability to cope, and range of symptoms and needs. Participants with a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) reported that they were well supported on their return home and their needs were met. Participants without a CNS were referred to the PHCT who were unsure how to assess or support them. These participants felt abandoned. There is a need for the rehabilitation of patients with rarer cancer to strengthen individual coping mechanisms, and family and social support. Although there are resource and training implications, this is a potential role for the PHCT, district nursing in particular, and may lead to more focused and targeted provision of services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations, social isolation and stigmatization, and emotional distress.

    “The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations (movements, pain, sleep problems, attention or concentration problems that affect daily life), [3–9], social isolation and stigmatization [3, 7, 9–13], and emotional distress (anger, depression, anxiety, hopelessness, loss, lack of control, abandonment) [3, 5, 8, 14–17].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 24

Authors
Griffiths, J., Willard, C., Burgess, A., Amir, Z., & Luker, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The Christie Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Jane
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
434-441
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121828195
Cited by
24
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Macmillan Cancer Support
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
cancer survivors, long-term survivorship, primary care, clinical nurse specialists, district nursing, psychosocial needs, physical needs, rehabilitation, coping, family and social support, post-treatment care, service delivery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aftercare, Attitude to Health, Continuity of Patient Care, England, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Nurse Clinicians, Oncology Nursing, Patient Discharge, Primary Health Care, Public Health Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Survivors, Disease-Free Survival, Needs Assessment, Nurse's Role, Rare Diseases, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review