Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of symptom clusters on functional status and quality of life in women with breast cancer

Open access
Dodd, Marylin J., Cho, Maria H., Cooper, Bruce A., Miaskowski, Christine·2010·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose The purposes of this study of women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy with/without radiation therapy were to determine whether: 1) subgroups of oncology outpatients can be identified based on a specific symptom cluster (i.e., pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, depression); 2) these subgroups differ on outcomes (i.e., functional status, quality of life; 3) subgroup membership changes over time. Methods A secondary data analysis using data collected from 112 women at initial chemotherapy. Symptom and outcome measures were completed at three time points: baseline (i.e., the week before cycle two - T1); end of cancer treatment (T2), end of the study (approximately one year after the start of chemotherapy - T3). Cluster analysis identified patient subgroups based on symptom severity scores. Results At T1 and T2, four patient subgroups were identified: ALL LOW (one or no symptom greater than the cut score), MILD (two symptoms), MODERATE (three or four symptoms), and ALL HIGH (four symptoms). At T3, three subgroups were identified: MILD, MODERATE and ALL HIGH. Subgroups with high severity levels of all four symptoms had poorer functional status and QOL at each time point than other subgroups (p<.001). Group membership changed over time. Conclusions Subgroups of patients with different symptom experiences were identified. For some patients severity of all four symptoms persisted months after cancer treatment. Initial and ongoing assessment to identify those patients in the ALL HIGH patient subgroup is important so that appropriate interventions to improve functional status and quality of life can be offered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.09.005

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bianco, 1991, Prognostic role of amenorrhea induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer, Br. J. Cancer, 63, 799, 10.1038/bjc.1991.177 · doi:10.1038/bjc.1991.177
  2. Hyde, 1973, Natural course of inoperable lung cancer, Chest, 64, 309, 10.1378/chest.64.3.309 · doi:10.1378/chest.64.3.309
  3. McQuitty, 1966, Similarity analysis of reciprocal pairs for discrete and continuous data, Edu. Psychol. Measure., 27, 21, 10.1177/001316446702700103 · doi:10.1177/001316446702700103
  4. Richards, 1990, Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer: an update of the Guy's/Manchester trial, J. Clin. Oncol., 8, 2032, 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.2032 · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.12.2032

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Dodd, M. J., Cho, M. H., Cooper, B. A., & Miaskowski, C.
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
101-110
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973003045
Cited by
290
References
70
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of symptom clusters on functional status and quality of life in women with breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejon.2009.09.005
The paper
Dodd, M. J., Cho, M. H., Cooper, B. A., & Miaskowski, C. (2010). The effect of symptom clusters on functional status and quality of life in women with breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2009.09.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.