The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Abstract
A Monte Carlo evaluation of 30 procedures for determining the number of clusters was conducted on artificial data sets which contained either 2, 3, 4, or 5 distinct nonoverlapping clusters. To provide a variety of clustering solutions, the data sets were analyzed by four hierarchical clustering methods. External criterion measures indicated excellent recovery of the true cluster structure by the methods at the correct hierarchy level. Thus, the clustering present in the data was quite strong. The simulation results for the stopping rules revealed a wide range in their ability to determine the correct number of clusters in the data. Several procedures worked fairly well, whereas others performed rather poorly. Thus, the latter group of rules would appear to have little validity, particularly for data sets containing distinct clusters. Applied researchers are urged to select one or more of the better criteria. However, users are cautioned that the performance of some of the criteria may be data dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1177/002224377901600411 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1983.4767342 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000533 · DOI
- 10.2307/2528592 · DOI
- Sarle, 1983, Cubic clustering criterion
- 10.1007/BF02293907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/comjnl/20.4.359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480256 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr0402_8 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr0503_6 · DOI · Paper page
- Bock, 1977, First international symposium on data analysis and informatics, 449
- Ratkowsky, 1978, A criterion for determining the number of groups in a classification, Australian Computer Journal, 10, 115
- Sneath, 1973, Numerical taxonomy
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr1603_7 · DOI
- 10.1086/337163 · DOI
- Lingoes, 1971, PEP-I: A FORTRAN IV (G) program for Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric probability clustering, Behaviorial Science, 16, 259
- Hartigan, 1975, Clustering algorithms
- Wong, 1982, Using the Kth nearest neighbor clustering procedure to determine the number of subpopulations, Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section, American Statistical Association, 40
- 10.1016/0031-3203(78)90008-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/56.3.463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1071/BT9660127 · DOI
- Calinski, 1974, A dendrite method for cluster analysis, Communications in Statistics, 3, 1
- 10.1093/biomet/65.1.31 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90046-X · DOI
- 10.2307/2258571 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481675 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477896 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1967.10500923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00401706.1967.10490438 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr1602_3 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289263 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2529003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1072 · DOI
- 10.1038/211329a0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02293899 · DOI · Paper page
- Ray, 1982, SAS user's guide: Statistics
- 10.1214/aos/1176344071 · DOI
- 10.2307/2257725 · DOI · Paper page
- Hansen, 1981, Objective assessment of cluster analysis output: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings, Proceedings of the American Institute for Decision Sciences, 314
- Beale, 1969, Cluster analysis
- Hartigan, 1977, Classification and clustering
- 10.1016/0031-3203(79)90034-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Naus, 1966, A power comparison of two tests of non-random clustering, Technometrics, 8, 493
- Ball, 1965, ISODATA, A novel method of data analysis and pattern classification
- Hall, 1973, Development of new pattern recognition methods
- 10.1177/001316448004000320 · DOI
- Mountford, 1970, Statistical Ecology, 237
- 10.1177/0013164484441003 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02312508 · DOI
- 10.1080/00223980.1963.9916640 · DOI
- 10.1080/00949658208810568 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0030740 · DOI
- Gower, 1975, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on numerical taxonomy
- Duda, 1973, Pattern classification and scene analysis
- Milligan, 1983, Proceedings of the 1982 NATO Advanced Studies Institute on Numerical Taxonomy, 167
- 10.1109/T-C.1970.222799 · DOI
- McClain, 1975, CLUSTISZ: A program to test for the quality of clustering of a set of objects, Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 456
- 10.1080/01621459.1969.10501084 · DOI
- 10.1177/014662168000400107 · DOI
- 10.2307/2528964 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909 · DOI · Paper page
- Perruchet, 1983, Les épreuves de classifiabilité en analyses des données
- Sokal, 1963, Principles of numerical taxonomy
- 10.2307/2528096 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90054-2 · DOI
- Gnanadesikan, 1977, Interpreting and assessing the results of cluster analyses, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 47, 451
Cited by
Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome
MetaHIT Consortium (additional members), Arumugam, M., Raes, J., Pelletier, E., Le Paslier, D., Yamada, T., Mende, D. R., Fernandes, G. R., Tap, J., Bruls, T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09944 · Cited by 7,548
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
OECD, Union, E., & Joint Research Centre - European Commission (2008) · doi:10.1787/9789264043466-en · Cited by 3,960
NbClust : An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06 · Cited by 3,396
Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00007-1 · Cited by 2,373
Metadata
- Authors
- Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-179
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W1975152892
- Cited by
- 3,868
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02294245
- The paper
- Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.