From bystander to enlisted carer – A qualitative study of the experiences of caregivers of patients attending follow-up after curative treatment for cancers in the pancreas, duodenum and bile duct
Abstract
Purpose Caregivers of patients with cancer play an important role throughout the treatment trajectory. This can be challenging and might infer health and psychosocial problems. This may especially be the case in caregivers of patients with cancers that carry a high risk of recurrence such as cancers of the pancreas, duodenum and bile duct. This study therefore explored the experiences of caregivers of patients attending follow-up after completion of treatment with curative intent for cancers of the pancreas, duodenum and bile duct. Methods A qualitative study using semi-structured, individual interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results Ten caregivers of patients attending follow-up after completed curative treatment for cancers of the pancreas, duodenum and bile duct in a specialized gastro-surgical center at a tertiary hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark participated. We identified three themes: "From bystander to enlisted carer", inferring that caregivers felt enlisted as carers during treatment and follow-up, however without sufficient instruction or assessment of their needs. "Lonesome worrying" meaning that caregivers hid their feelings of concern and foreboding, and finally, "Keeping a stiff upper lip" indicating that caregivers outwardly maintained a positive face when interacting with the patient. Conclusion Caregivers described taking on a substantial burden of care without feeling competent. They experienced distress and emotional isolation…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adverse effects of informal caregiving are increasingly appreciated in various diseases including cancer.
“The adverse effects of informal caregiving are increasingly appreciated in various diseases including cancer [9, 10].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703 · see citing works
Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer
Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1670 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Lund, L., Ross, L., Petersen, M. A., & Groenvold, M. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2529-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Relationship quality and burden among caregivers for late-stage cancer patients
Francis, L. E., Worthington, J., Kypriotakis, G., & Rose, J. H. (2010) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0765-5 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S., & Sharp, L. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“The adverse effects of informal caregiving are increasingly appreciated in various diseases including cancer [9, 10].”
Smith, A. ‘., Wu, V. S., Lambert, S., Lamarche, J., Lebel, S., Leske, S., & Girgis, A. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-021-01109-4 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gerhardt, S., Dengsø, K. E., Herling, S., & Thomsen, T.
- Affiliations
- Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Gerhardt, Stine
- Venue
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 44
- Pages
- 101717
- ISSN
- 1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996274438
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0017022, NNF16OC0022680)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver experiences, cancer caregivers, pancreatic cancer, duodenal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, cancer follow-up care, curative treatment, caregiver burden, emotional distress, caregiver distress, caregiver-patient relationship, coping, caregiver needs assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Denmark, Duodenal Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Caregivers, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review