Cited by 48Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeNursing care and research

A systematic mixed studies review of fear of cancer recurrence in families and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer

Open access
Smith, Allan ‘Ben’, Wu, Verena Shuwen, Lambert, Sylvie, Lamarche, Jani, Lebel, Sophie, Leske, Stuart, Girgis, Afaf·2022·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) may be equally prevalent, persistent and burdensome in cancer caregivers as in survivors. This systematic review evaluated FCR prevalence, severity, correlates, course, impact and interventions in cancer caregivers.Methods Electronic databases were searched from 1997 to May 2021. Two reviewers identified eligible peer-reviewed qualitative or quantitative studies on FCR in adult caregivers or family members of adult cancer survivors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools for randomised and non-randomised studies and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis and thematic synthesis occurred on quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively.Results Of 2418 papers identified, 70 reports (59 peer-reviewed articles, 11 postgraduate theses) from 63 studies were included. Approximately 50% of caregivers experienced FCR. Younger caregivers and those caring for survivors with worse FCR or overall health reported higher FCR. Most studies found caregivers' FCR levels were equal to or greater than survivors'. Caregivers' FCR was persistently elevated but peaked approaching survivor follow-up appointments. Caregivers' FCR was associated with poorer quality of life in caregivers and survivors. Three studies found couple-based FCR interventions were acceptable, but had limited efficacy.Conclusions FCR in caregivers is prevalent, persistent and burdensome. Younger caregivers of survivors with worse overall health or FCR are at the greatest risk. Further research on identifying and treating caregivers' FCR is required.Implications for cancer survivors Caregiver and survivor FCR are similarly impactful and appear interrelated. Addressing FCR may improve outcomes for both cancer caregivers and survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-021-01109-4

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 109 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A. ‘., Wu, V. S., Lambert, S., Lamarche, J., Lebel, S., Leske, S., & Girgis, A.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool Hospital (AU)
  • St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Smith, Allan ‘Ben’
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2021-11-11
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1184-1219
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W3212205809
Cited by
48
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Cancer Institute NSW
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
fear of cancer recurrence, cancer caregivers, family caregivers, cancer survivors, caregiver burden, quality of life, prevalence, couple-based interventions, caregiver age
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Quality of Life, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review