The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating cost taxonomies for information systems management
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cost minimization is an emergent challenge.
“Researchers assert that cost minimization is an emergent challenge (Irani, Ghoneim, & Love, 2006;Irani, 2010), with Gu et al., 2015 explaining the challenges of processing BD across geo-distributed data centers.”
From Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods (2017) · cites this paper as Irani, Ghoneim, & Love, 2006
The Introduction describes rising IS costs and the difficulty of identifying and evaluating them; the Conclusions say organizations increasingly seek to manage technology costs. This supports cost reduction as a growing challenge in IS management, but the paper does not establish the broader claim that cost minimization generally is an emergent challenge. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Anandarajan, 1999, Evaluation of information technology investment, Management Decision, 37, 329, 10.1108/00251749910269375 · DOI
- Ballantine, 1998, Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process, The Journal of Information Technology, 13, 3, 10.1080/026839698344927 · DOI
- Ballantine, 1999, Information systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practice compared, Logistics Information Management, 12, 78, 10.1108/09576059910256286 · DOI
- David, 2002, Managing your IT total cost of ownership, Communications of the ACM, 45, 101, 10.1145/502269.502273 · DOI
- D.H. Dier, J.G. Mooney, Enhancing the evaluation of information technology investment through comprehensive cost analysis, in: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference for IT Evaluation, Henley Management College, Henley on Thames, 1994.
- Heo, 2003, Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation, Information and Management, 40, 243, 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00007-1 · DOI
- Hochstrasser, 1990, Evaluating IT investments—matching techniques to projects, Journal of Intelligent Systems, 5, 215
- Irani, 2002, Information systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain, Information and Management, 40, 11, 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00128-8 · DOI
- Irani, 1997, Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process, Technovation, 17, 695, 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00060-6 · DOI
- Irani, 2002, Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation, European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 74, 10.1057/palgrave/ejis/3000411 · DOI
- Irani, 2001, The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 161
- Irani, 2003, The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles, Information and Management, 42, 177, 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00046-6 · DOI
- Kaplan, 1984, Yesterday’s accounting undermines production, Harvard Business Review, 62, 95
- R.J. Kusters, T.J.W. Renkema, Managing IT investment decisions in their organizational context: The design of ‘local for local’ evaluation models, in: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference for IT Evaluation, Bath University School of Management, Bath University, Bath, 1996.
- Legris, 2003, Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information and Management, 40, 191, 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Milis, 2004, The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of Information and Communication Technology projects, International Journal of Project Management, 22, 87, 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00060-7 · DOI
- S. Mohamed, Z. Irani, Developing taxonomy of information system’s indirect human costs, in: 2nd International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, University of Salford, UK, 2002.
- D. Paula, L. Laurence, Control of the information systems function: The role of cost allocation, in: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference for IT Evaluation, University of Delft, The Netherlands, 1997.
- Powell, 1992, Information technology evaluation: Is it different?, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 29, 10.1057/jors.1992.4 · DOI
- D. Remenyi, S. Michael, W. Terry, Outcomes and benefits for information systems investment, in: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference for IT Evaluation, Bath University School of Management, Bath University, Bath, 1996.
- Renkema, 1997, Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: A comparative review, Information and Software Technology, 39, 1, 10.1016/0950-5849(96)85006-3 · DOI
- Ryan, 2000, Considering social subsystem costs and benefits in information technology investment decisions: A view from the field on anticipated payoffs, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 11, 10.1080/07421222.2000.11518264 · DOI
- Sillince, 1998, Integration of requirements determination and business process re-engineering: A case study of an Ambulatory Care and Diagnostic (ACAD) Center, European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 115, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000294 · DOI
- Wheatley, 1997, Hidden costs of the humble PC, Management Today, 52
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J.-F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009 · Cited by 2,474
Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods
Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M. M., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001 · Cited by 2,066
Self-citationBig data with cognitive computing: A review for the future
Gupta, S., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A., & Al-Khowaiter, W. A. A. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.005 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Irani, Z., Ghoneim, A., & Love, P. E. D.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Irani, Zahir
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1103-1122
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096425259
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/R08025)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- information system evaluation, information systems adoption, cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, IT investment, cost control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
