Cited by 448Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Data Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction

Comprehensible credit scoring models using rule extraction from support vector machines

Open access
Martens, David, Baesens, Bart, Van Gestel, Tony, Vanthienen, Jan·2007·European Journal of Operational Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.051

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pedagogical techniques directly extract rules relating inputs and outputs of the predictor, while decompositional approaches are closely intertwined with the internal structure of the SVM.

    “Pedagogical techniques f directly extract rules which relate the inputs and outputs of the predictor (e.g. [20,37]), while decompositional approaches are closely intertwined with the internal structure of the SVM (e.g. [70,28]).”

    From A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models (2019) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martens, D., Baesens, B., Van Gestel, T., & Vanthienen, J.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Martens, David
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
183
Issue
3
Pages
1466-1476
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123427206
Cited by
448
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
29.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Keywords
support vector machine, rule extraction, interpretable classification, credit scoring, credit risk assessment, trepan, explainable AI, diagnosis, comprehensibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review