Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions

Brandenburg, Marcus, Govindan, Kannan, Sarkis, Joseph, Seuring, Stefan·2014·European Journal of Operational Research
DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Abreu, 2008, On the role of value systems to promote the sustainability of collaborative environments, International Journal of Production Research, 46, 1207, 10.1080/00207540701224244 · DOI
  2. Agrell, 2004, Interactive multi-objective agro-ecological land use planning: The Bungoma region in Kenya, European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 194, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00355-2 · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00355-2
  3. Athanasopoulou, 2009, Relationship quality: A critical literature review and research agenda, European Journal of Marketing, 43, 583, 10.1108/03090560910946945 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Andersson, 1998, The feasibility of including sustainability in LCA for product development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, 289, 10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00028-6 · DOI
  5. Bertrand, 2002, Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 241, 10.1108/01443570210414338 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, 1995, Interactions between operational research and environmental management, European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 229, 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00294-M · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bovea, 2003, Identifying environmental improvement options by combining life cycle assessment and fuzzy set theory, International Journal of Production Research, 41, 593, 10.1080/0020754021000033878 · doi:10.1080/0020754021000033878
  8. Brent, 2007, Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 403, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015 · DOI
  9. Carter, 2011, Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 46, 10.1108/09600031111101420 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Carter, 2008, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 360, 10.1108/09600030810882816 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Che, 2010, Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and particle swarm optimisation for balanced and defective supply chain problems considering WEEE/RoHS directives, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 3355, 10.1080/00207540802702080 · doi:10.1080/00207540802702080
  12. Chen, 2012, Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties, Transportation Research Part E, 48, 150, 10.1016/j.tre.2011.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Clift, 2003, Metrics for supply chain sustainability, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 5, 240, 10.1007/s10098-003-0220-0 · DOI
  14. Cooper, 1997, Supply chain management – More than a new name for logistics, International Journal of Logistics Management, 8, 1, 10.1108/09574099710805556 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Daniel, 1997, Operations research and environmental planning, European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 248, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00107-0 · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00107-0
  16. Darlington, 2007, Hybrid two-stage planning for food industry overproduction waste minimization, International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4273, 10.1080/00207540701474773 · DOI
  17. Dekker, 2012, Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges, European Journal of Operational Research, 219, 671, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dey, 2006, Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique, International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 90, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.018 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.018
  19. Edwards, 2010, Comparative analysis of the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing – A “last mile” perspective, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40, 103, 10.1108/09600031011018055 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Feng, 2007, Assessing the impacts of South-to-North water transfer project with decision support systems, Decision Support Systems, 42, 1989, 10.1016/j.dss.2004.11.004 · DOI
  21. Fichtner, 2004, Inter-firm energy supply concepts: An option for cleaner energy production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 891, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.036 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.036
  22. Figge, 2012, Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects, International Journal of Production Economics, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.001 · DOI
  23. Fleischmann, 1997, Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review, European Journal of Operational Research, 103, 1, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Garfield, 2004, Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature, Journal of Information Science, 30, 119, 10.1177/0165551504042802 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Georgopoulou, 1998, Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation, European Journal of Operational Research, 109, 483, 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00072-1 · DOI
  26. Ghadimi, 2012, A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: A case study in automotive industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 10, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.010 · DOI
  27. Gold, 2010, The constructs of sustainable supply chain management – A content analysis based on published case studies, Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 7, 114, 10.1504/PIE.2010.036045 · DOI
  28. Gold, 2010, Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 230, 10.1002/csr.207 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Golicic, 2013, A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49, 78, 10.1111/jscm.12006 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Guide, 2009, The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research, Operations Research, 57, 10, 10.1287/opre.1080.0628 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Gungor, 1999, Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: A survey, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36, 811, 10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00167-9 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Gunson, 2010, Reducing mine water network energy requirements, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1328, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.002 · DOI
  33. Handfield, 2002, Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 70, 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Harris, 2011, Assessing the impact of cost optimization based on infrastructure modeling on CO2 emissions, International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 313, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.03.005 · DOI
  35. Hassini, 2012, A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chain management with a focus on metrics, International Journal of Production Economics, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hsu, 2008, Green supply chain management in the electronic industry, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 205, 10.1007/BF03326014 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hu, 2009, Modeling sustainable product life cycle decision support systems, International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 366, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.011 · DOI
  38. Ilgin, 2010, Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO). A review of the state of the art, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 563, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kainuma, 2006, A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 101, 99, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kaldellis, 2009, Optimum autonomous photovoltaic solution for the Greek islands on the basis of energy pay-back analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1311, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.016 · DOI
  41. Kannegiesser, 2013, Sustainable development of global supply chains—Part 1: Sustainability optimization framework, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal
  42. Kannegiesser, 2013, Sustainable development of global supply chains—Part 2: Investigation of the European automotive industry, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal
  43. Kengpol, 2011, The decision support framework for developing Ecodesign at conceptual phase based upon ISO/TR 14062, International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 4, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.006 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.006
  44. Kiwjaroun, 2009, LCA studies comparing biodiesel synthesized by conventional and supercritical methanol methods, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 143, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.011 · DOI
  45. Kleijnen, 2005, Supply chain simulation tools and techniques: A survey, International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 1, 82, 10.1504/IJSPM.2005.007116 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kleindorfer, 2005, Sustainable operations management, Production and Operations Management, 14, 482, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kuo, 2010, Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1161, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lage Junior, 2010, Variations of the Kanban system: Literature review and classification, International Journal of Production Economics, 125, 13, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lee, 2010, The design of sustainable logistics network under uncertainty, International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 159, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.009 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.009
  50. Lee, 2012, Dynamic and multidimensional measurement of product-service system (PSS) sustainability: A triple bottom line (TBL)-based system dynamics approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 32, 173, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Linnenluecke, 2012, Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structures of the corporate sustainability field, Global Environmental Change
  52. Linninger, 2000, Planning of waste reduction strategies under uncertainty, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24, 1043, 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00530-5 · doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(00)00530-5
  53. Liu, 2011, Constructivism scenario evolutionary analysis of zero emission regional planning: A case of Qaidam Circular Economy Pilot Area in China, International Journal of Production Economics
  54. Lovric, 2012, Sustainable revenue management: A smart card enabled agent-based modeling approach, Decision Support Systems
  55. Mentzer, 2001, Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 1, 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x · DOI · Paper page
  56. Meredith, 1993, Theory building through conceptual methods, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13, 3
  57. Min, 2012, Green supply chain research: Past, present, and future, Logistics Research, 4, 39, 10.1007/s12159-012-0071-3 · doi:10.1007/s12159-012-0071-3
  58. Mouzon, 2007, Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment, International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4247, 10.1080/00207540701450013 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Munda, 2009, A conflict analysis approach for illuminating distributional issues in sustainability policy, European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 307, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.061 · DOI
  60. Radulescu, 2009, Sustainable production technologies which take into account environmental constraints, European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 730, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.057 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.057
  61. ReVelle, 2000, Research challenges in environmental management, European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 218, 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00213-1 · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00213-1
  62. Saint Jean, 2008, Polluting emissions standards and clean technology trajectories under competitive selection and supply chain pressure, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16S1, S113, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.009 · DOI
  63. Sarkis, 1998, Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 159, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00160-4 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Sarkis, 2012, A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 202, 10.1108/13598541211212924 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Sarkis, 2011, An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature, International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Sasikumar, 2008, Issues in reverse supply chains, part I: End-of-life product recovery and inventory management – An overview, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1, 154, 10.1080/19397030802433860 · DOI
  67. Sasikumar, 2008, Issues in reverse supply chain, part II: Reverse distribution issues – An overview, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1, 234, 10.1080/19397030802509974 · DOI
  68. Sasikumar, 2009, Issues in reverse supply chain, part III: Classification and simple analysis, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2, 2, 10.1080/19397030802673374 · DOI
  69. Sbihi, A., & Eglese, R. W. (2007). Combinatorial optimization and green logistics. 4OR, 5, 99–116. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Seuring, 2008, Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13, 128, 10.1108/13598540810860967 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Seuring, 2012, A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management, Decision Support Systems
  72. Seuring, 2012, Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 544, 10.1108/13598541211258609 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Seuring, 2008, From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Seuring, 2008, Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – A Delphi study, Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 455, 10.1002/bse.607 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Sheu, 2005, An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management, Transportation Research Part E, 41, 287, 10.1016/j.tre.2004.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Smith, 2012, Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows, International Journal of Production Economics, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036
  77. Srivastava, 2007, Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · DOI · Paper page
  78. Stock, 2009, Developing a consensus definition of supply chain management: A qualitative study, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39, 690, 10.1108/09600030910996323 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Stuart, 2002, Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective, Journal of Operations Management, 20, 419, 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Supply-Chain Council (Ed.), (2008). Supply chain operations reference model SCOR version 9.0. Pittsburgh: Supply-Chain Council.
  81. Tang, 2012, Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations, European Journal of Operational Research, 223, 585, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.030 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Tsai, 2009, A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 4991, 10.1080/00207540801932498 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Tseng, 2009, Fuzzy AHP-based study of cleaner production implementation in Taiwan PWB manufacturer, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1249, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Ukidwe, 2005, Flow of natural versus economic capital in industrial supply networks and its implications to sustainability, Environmental Science Technology, 39, 9759, 10.1021/es050627n · doi:10.1021/es050627n
  85. Ülengin, 2010, A problem-structuring model for analyzing transportation–environment relationships, European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 844, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.023 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.023
  86. van der Vorst, 2009, Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign; integrated decision making on product quality, sustainability and logistics, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 6611, 10.1080/00207540802356747 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Wang, 2011, A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design, Decision Support Systems, 51, 262, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Whitefoot, 2012, Design incentives to increase vehicle size created from the US footprint-based fuel economy standards, Energy Policy, 41, 402, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.062 · DOI
  89. Wu, 2004, Corporate optimal production planning with varying environmental costs: A grey compromise programming approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 155, 68, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00820-2 · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00820-2
  90. Yakovleva, 2011, Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: The case of the food industry, International Journal of Production Research
  91. Yalabik, 2011, Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation, International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 519, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Yura, 1994, Production scheduling to satisfy worker’s preference for days off and overtime under due-date constraints, International Journal of Production Economics, 33, 265, 10.1016/0925-5273(94)90139-2 · doi:10.1016/0925-5273(94)90139-2
  93. Zanoni, 2011, Chilled or frozen? Decision strategies for sustainable food supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics

Cited by

See all 1,198

Metadata

Authors
Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S.
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
233
Issue
2
Pages
299-312
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032
OpenAlex
W1997383668
Cited by
1,198
References
0
FWCI
201.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032
The paper
Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.