The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship quality: a critical literature review and research agenda
Abstract
Purpose: In today's highly competitive environment losing customers is very costly. Customer retention and loyalty have become possible through the development of long‐term, mutually beneficial relationships with customers. This paper seeks to critically review the literature on relationship quality (RQ) and to suggest avenues for further research. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected with impartial cross‐referencing of papers published in all major journals in the marketing area. Papers are presented in tabulated form based on six rigorously cross‐checked categories of information. Findings: Most RQ research centres on business‐to‐business (b‐to‐b) markets and products use survey data, look at relationships from the customer perspective and analyse either the US or European markets. Also, results differ in various contexts and there is no universally accepted framework for RQ. By analysing the different variables used in previous studies, a general conceptual framework is provided for the study of RQ. Research limitations/implications: The characteristics of RQ research that were identified from the review indicate that future research should focus on service and retail settings; validate existing conceptual frameworks across countries and contexts; do more seller and dyad studies; use more qualitative approaches to capture the subtle differences between contexts; analyse RQ in different relationship development stages, and look at new types of relationships between parties that may not be individuals or businesses or may not assume the traditional roles of buyer and seller. Practical implications: The framework developed here provides firms with a guide to the factors that may affect the quality of their relationships with customers and helps them in developing effective relationship marketing strategies. Originality/value: The paper provides a comprehensive review of the RQ literature that has not been done before and develops a general framework that can be applied in all contexts and will guide future studies in the area. Overall, the study helps researchers identify the critical issues and concepts related to RQ and shapes future research in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships
Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300205 · Cited by 4,899
Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400306 · Cited by 4,763
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006 · Cited by 2,301
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00002-0 · Cited by 890
The business of international business is culture
Hofstede, G. (1994) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/0969-5931(94)90011-6 · Cited by 835
Cited by
The effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty
Liu, C.-T., Guo, Y. M., & Lee, C.-H. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.008 · Cited by 490
Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner
Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12011 · Cited by 342
Measuring customer experience in banks: scale development and validation
Garg, R., Rahman, Z., & Qureshi, M. N. (2014) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-07-2012-0023 · Cited by 196
Tandon, U., Kiran, R., & Sah, A. N. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0341-3 · Cited by 157
Relationship Marketing and Customer Retention - A Systematic Literature Review
Rosário, A., & Casaca, J. A. (2023) · Studies in Business and Economics · doi:10.2478/sbe-2023-0044 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Athanasopoulou, P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-05-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5/6
- Pages
- 583-610
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968743566
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship quality: a critical literature review and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560910946945
- The paper
- Athanasopoulou, P. (2009). Relationship quality: a critical literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910946945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.