The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, as was discussed earlier, both WoS and Scopus classifications are not perfect and they may introduce certain biases in normalizing impact indicators [221].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [221]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, it raises the question of validity for comparisons, as journals or other document sets are being evaluated against unequal benchmarks [221].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [221]
In the citing paper
“the values of mean-based indicators can be highly distorted by the presence of few highly cited publications [44,45,221,224,277-279].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [221]
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Aad, G., Abajyan, T., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Khalek, S. A., Abdelalim, A. A., Abdinov, O., Aben, R. Z., Abi, B., Abolins, M., et al. (2012) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 · Cited by 10,498
Theory and practise of the g-index
Egghe, L. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 · Cited by 2,354
Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas
Garfield, E. (1955) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.122.3159.108 · Cited by 2,334
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
Performance-based university research funding systems
Hicks, D. M. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 · Cited by 1,076
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
Self-citationMeho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero‐Bote, V. P., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002 · Cited by 867
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Association of Business Schools. 1/3/2010. Academic journal quality guide, from http://www.bizschooljournals.com/node/4.
- Bergstrom, 2007, Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, College and Research Library News, 68, 3146
- Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2015). Academic journal guide 2015, from http://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015/.
- Harzing, A.-W. (2009). Journal Quality List 55th. Retrieved January, 2015, from http://www.harzing.com/jql.htm.
- Jacso, 2005, As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases, Current Science, 89, 1537
- van Raan, 2005, Measuring science: Capita selectaof current main issues, Vol. 19–50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1177/1069031x211004234 · Cited by 243
Soft Robotics: Academic Insights and Perspectives Through Bibliometric Analysis
Bao, G., Fang, H., Chen, L., Wan, Y., Xu, F., Yang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Soft Robotics · doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0135 · Cited by 203
Forty years of the International Journal of Information Management: A bibliometric analysis
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Gupta, P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102307 · Cited by 227
Green finance for green buildings: A systematic review and conceptual foundation
Akomea-Frimpong, I., Kukah, A. S. K., Jin, X., Osei‐Kyei, R., & Pariafsai, F. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131869 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Mingers, J., & Yang, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mingers, John
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 323-337
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2343018080
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 11.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- journal quality, citation metrics, journal rankings, h-index, journal impact factor, SNIP, Eigenfactor, research evaluation, REF, business and management journals, bibliometric analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
