Cited by 184scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management

Open access

Mingers, John, Yang, Liying·2017·European Journal of Operational Research

DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
Aad, G., Abajyan, T., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Khalek, S. A., Abdelalim, A. A., Abdinov, O., Aben, R. Z., Abi, B., Abolins, M., et al. (2012) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 · Cited by 10,498
Theory and practise of the g-index
Egghe, L. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 · Cited by 2,354
Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas
Garfield, E. (1955) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.122.3159.108 · Cited by 2,334
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
Performance-based university research funding systems
Hicks, D. M. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 · Cited by 1,076
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
Self-citation
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero‐Bote, V. P., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002 · Cited by 867
When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings
Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012181 · Cited by 853
h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001 · Cited by 841
Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 · Cited by 760
The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S. A., Jones, R. D., Kain, R. J. P., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M. A., et al. (2015) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363 · Cited by 738
Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis
Harzing, A.-W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2007) · Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics · doi:10.3354/esep00076 · Cited by 677
What do we know about the h index?
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20609 · Cited by 672
College Libraries and Chemical Education
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.66.1713.385 · Cited by 649
Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism
Michael Hall, C. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001 · Cited by 634
Measuring Contextual Citation Impact of Scientific Journals
Moed, H. F. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002 · Cited by 628
Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups
van Raan, A. F. J. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1556/scient.67.2006.3.10 · Cited by 627
How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management
Ràfols, I., Loet Leydesdorff, A., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015 · Cited by 616
Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics
Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(76)90048-0 · Cited by 601
The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index
Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007) · Chinese Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9 · Cited by 563
Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor
Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V., Jorge, R. A., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.08-107938 · Cited by 559
Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014848323806 · Cited by 558
New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications
Moed, H. F., Bruin, R. E. D., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02017338 · Cited by 502
Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?
Cronin, B. (2001) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.1097 · Cited by 500
The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001 · Cited by 499
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20806 · Cited by 462
Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: reactivity and the ABS list
Willmott, H. C. (2011) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508411403532 · Cited by 456
Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing
Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212540 · Cited by 433
New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing
Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140304 · Cited by 427
A Further Step Forward in Measuring Journals’ Scientific Prestige: The SJR2 Indicator
Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001 · Cited by 406
Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4 · Cited by 403
Journal status
Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Herbert Van De Sompel, A. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z · Cited by 403
Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science
Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20874 · Cited by 383
The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments
van Raan, A. F. J. (2003) · TATuP Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis · doi:10.14512/tatup.12.1.20 · Cited by 359
The R- and AR-indices： Complementing the h-index
Jin, J., BiHui, Liang, L., Liming, Ronald, R., Rousseau, ., Leo, L., & Egghe (2007) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · Cited by 352
On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact
Glänzel, W. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0102-4 · Cited by 307
The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities
Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006) · J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1002/asi.20349 · Cited by 294
Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis
Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. X. (2007) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006 · Cited by 293
Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison
S. Adriaanse, L., & Rensleigh, C. (2013) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-12-2011-0174 · Cited by 284
Measures for measures
Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., & Lautrup, B. E. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441003a · Cited by 281
Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists
Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. C. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726712467048 · Cited by 274
Self-citation
A Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business
Harzing, A.-W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20953 · Cited by 274
Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals
Lowry, P. B., Romans, D., PricewaterhouseCoopers, & Curtis, A. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00045 · Cited by 270
A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar
Franceschet, M. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2 · Cited by 236
Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields
Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharromán, C. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1805-x · Cited by 232
The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web
Khabsa, M., & Giles, C. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093949 · Cited by 227
Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0352-7 · Cited by 220
Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.186316 · Cited by 211
The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits
Bornmann, L., Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Mutz, R. (2012) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.001 · Cited by 205
Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management
Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0270-0 · Cited by 198
Self-citation
Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars’ Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value?1
Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D., Gaskin, J. E., Galletta, D. F., Humpherys, S. L., Barlow, J. B., & Wilson, D. W. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.01 · Cited by 192
Some Modifications to the SNIP Journal Impact Indicator
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011 · Cited by 191
The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor
Fersht, A. R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903307106 · Cited by 190
Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor
Zitt, M., & Small, H. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20880 · Cited by 184
Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
Loet Leydesdorff, A., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Tobias Opthof, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21534 · Cited by 170
Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Bornmann, L. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21609 · Cited by 164
Scopus’s Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) versus a Journal Impact Factor Based on Fractional Counting of Citations
Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21371 · Cited by 160
The Seductive Power of Academic Journal Rankings: Challenges of Searching for the Otherwise
Nkomo, S. M. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012184 · Cited by 154
A Systematic Empirical Comparison of Different Approaches for Normalizing Citation Impact Indicators
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002 · Cited by 153
Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively
Saad, G. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0142-9 · Cited by 143
Methods for the Generation of Normalized Citation Impact Scores in Bibliometrics: Which Method Best Reflects the Judgements of Experts?
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006 · Cited by 138
The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories ( WC s) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies”
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23408 · Cited by 129
Using the h‐index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship
Oppenheim, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20460 · Cited by 124
Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management
Mingers, J., Macri, F., & Petrovici, D. A. (2011) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.009 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review
Moed, H. F. (2007) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.3152/030234207x255179 · Cited by 114
The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator
Norris, M. W., & Oppenheim, C. (2010) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220411011066790 · Cited by 114
The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face
Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.009 · Cited by 113
The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions
Adams, J. R. (2009) · Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis · doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0003-3 · Cited by 104
Journal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide
Morris, H., Harvey, C. E., & Kelly, A. (2009) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251740910995648 · Cited by 103
Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology
García‐Pérez, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21372 · Cited by 101
Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science
Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2 · Cited by 99
Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index
Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001 · Cited by 97
Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse
Truex, D. P., III, Cuellar, M. J., & Takeda, H. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00203 · Cited by 88
Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system
van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014808709694 · Cited by 86
The source normalized impact per paper is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact
Moed, H. F. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21424 · Cited by 85
Producing Spaces for Academic Discourse: The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises and Journal Quality Rankings
Northcott, D., & Linacre, S. (2010) · Australian Accounting Review · doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00079.x · Cited by 85
Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index
Mingers, J. (2008) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2008.94 · Cited by 81
Self-citation
Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. A. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.001 · Cited by 81
The Value of Scientometric Studies: An Introduction to a Debate on IS as a Reference Discipline
Editor, F. J. S., & Straub, D. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00091 · Cited by 79
Bibliometric Indicators Reflect Publication and Management Strategies
Moed, H. F. (2000) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1005695111622 · Cited by 78
Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers
Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0660-6 · Cited by 75
What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines?
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero‐Bote, V. P., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2010) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551510366077 · Cited by 74
The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized G oogle S cholar data for the publications of a research institute
Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23627 · Cited by 74
Journal list fetishism and the ‘sign of 4’ in the ABS guide: A question of trust?
Hussain, S. (2013) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508413506763 · Cited by 72
Information science and scientists: JASIS, 1972-1990
Harter, S. P., & Hooten, P. A. (1992) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199210)43:9 · Cited by 69
Food for Thought on theABS Academic Journal Quality Guide
Hussain, S. (2011) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2011.596659 · Cited by 67
CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre
Moed, H. F. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009 · Cited by 63
Big Macs and Eigenfactor scores: Don't let correlation coefficients fool you
West, J. D., Bergstrom, T. C., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21374 · Cited by 62
Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window
Campanario, J. M. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0334-1 · Cited by 61
Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma
Brumback, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073808315170 · Cited by 61
Explicit and Implicit Subject Bias in theABS Journal Quality Guide
Hoepner, A. G. F., & Unerman, J. (2012) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2011.651291 · Cited by 57
Issues and Opinions—Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?
Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A., Schneider, C., & Dennis, A. R. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0089 · Cited by 55
Aggregated Journal–Journal Citation Relations in Scopus and Web of Science Matched and Compared in Terms of Networks, Maps, and Interactive Overlays
Leydesdorff, L., de Moya‐Anegón, F., & de Nooy, W. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23372 · Cited by 44
A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. P., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0345-6 · Cited by 43
The j-index: a new bibliometric index and multivariate comparisons between other common indices
Todeschini, R. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0346-5 · Cited by 41
The demise of the ARC journal ranking scheme: an ex post analysis of the accounting and finance journals
Moosa, I. A. (2011) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-629x.2011.00432.x · Cited by 36
The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals: Some Problems with the Use of Scientometric Indicators in Journal and Research Evaluations
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Milojević, S. (2015) · Soziale Welt · doi:10.5771/0038-6073-2015-2-193 · Cited by 33
Behind citing-side normalization of citations: some properties of the journal impact factor
Zitt, M. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0441-7 · Cited by 31
Identifying research fields within business and management: a journal cross-citation analysis
Mingers, J., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2014) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2014.113 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Journal Quality and Citations: Common Metrics and Considerations about Their Use
Straub, D. W., & Anderson, C. S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · Cited by 24
Editor’s Comments
Straub, & Anderson, �. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721411 · Cited by 23
Fairness in the Institutional Valuation of Business Journals1
Templeton, G. F., & Lewis, B. R. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.3.01 · Cited by 22
Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus
Pislyakov, V. V. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2016-1 · Cited by 22
Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions
Moed, H. F. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1781-5 · Cited by 22
Citation Counts: Are They Good Predictors of RAE Scores?
Mahdi, S., & Neely, A. D. (2008) · Cited by 22
Problems with the SNIP indicator
Mingers, J. (2014) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.004 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Data-driven journal meta-ranking in business and management
Ennas, G., Biggio, B., & Guardo, M. C. D. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1751-y · Cited by 16
Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
Wouters, P. F., Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Franssen, T. (2015) · Cited by 16
Foreword to the “Case Studies in Scientometrics” special issues
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. P. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1755-7 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 6

Association of Business Schools. 1/3/2010. Academic journal quality guide, from http://www.bizschooljournals.com/node/4.
Bergstrom, 2007, Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, College and Research Library News, 68, 3146
Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2015). Academic journal guide 2015, from http://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015/.
Harzing, A.-W. (2009). Journal Quality List 55th. Retrieved January, 2015, from http://www.harzing.com/jql.htm.
Jacso, 2005, As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases, Current Science, 89, 1537
van Raan, 2005, Measuring science: Capita selectaof current main issues, Vol. 19–50

Sorted by citations

Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
Research Constituents, Intellectual Structure, and Collaboration Patterns in Journal of International Marketing : An Analytical Retrospective
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1177/1069031x211004234 · Cited by 243
Soft Robotics: Academic Insights and Perspectives Through Bibliometric Analysis
Bao, G., Fang, H., Chen, L., Wan, Y., Xu, F., Yang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Soft Robotics · doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0135 · Cited by 203
Forty years of the International Journal of Information Management: A bibliometric analysis
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Gupta, P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102307 · Cited by 227
Green finance for green buildings: A systematic review and conceptual foundation
Akomea-Frimpong, I., Kukah, A. S. K., Jin, X., Osei‐Kyei, R., & Pariafsai, F. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131869 · Cited by 162

See all 184

Authors: Mingers, J., & Yang, L.
Affiliations: University of Kent (GB)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author: Mingers, John
ORCID: Mingers, John
Yang, Liying
Venue: European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2017-02
Volume: 257
Issue: 1
Pages: 323-337
ISSN: 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058
OpenAlex: W2343018080
Cited by: 184
References: 123
Citations by year: 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
FWCI: 11.93
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
arxiv.org
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords: journal quality, citation metrics, journal rankings, h-index, journal impact factor, SNIP, Eigenfactor, research evaluation, REF, business and management journals, bibliometric analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks