The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method
Abstract
This paper proposes a comprehensive Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM) method with probabilistic linguistic information based on a new consensus measure and a novel outranking method, Gained and Lost Dominance Score (GLDS). Firstly, new operations of the probabilistic linguistic term sets are introduced based on the adjusted rules of probabilistic linguistic term sets and the linguistic scale functions for semantics of linguistic terms. After defining a new consensus measure based on the correlation degree between probabilistic linguistic term sets, we develop a consensus reaching method to improve the consensus degree of a group. To rank alternatives reasonably, we further propose the GLDS method which considers both the “group utility” and the “individual regret” values. The core of the GLDS is to calculate the gained and lost dominance scores that the optimal solution dominates all other alternatives in terms of the net gained dominance flow and the net lost dominance flow. Then, we integrate the GLDS ranking method with the consensus reaching process and develop a consensus-based PL-GLDS method to solve the MCGDM problems with probabilistic linguistic information. Finally, the proposed method is validated by a case study of selecting optimal green enterprises. Some comparative analyses are given to show the efficiency of the proposed method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 · Cited by 12,187
The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1 · Cited by 12,139
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 4,988
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making
Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2170076 · Cited by 2,328
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Chen, S.-J., & Hwang, C.-L. (1992) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4 · Cited by 1,883
Linking Crystallographic Model and Data Quality
Karplus, P. A., & Diederichs, K. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218231 · Cited by 1,781
PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021 · Cited by 1,686
Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making
Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021 · Cited by 1,289
Cited by
Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Pardasani, K. R., Mardani, A., Liao, H., & Streimikiene, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117936 · Cited by 297
Self-citationAleksić, A., Tadić, D., Komatina, N., & Nestić, S. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13132216 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, X., & Liao, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1017-1027
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887518336
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 35.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044
- The paper
- Wu, X., & Liao, H. (2019). A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.