Cited by 1,781Enzyme Structure and FunctionX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyCrystal structures of chemical compounds

Linking Crystallographic Model and Data Quality

Open access
Karplus, P. Andrew, Diederichs, Kay·2012·Science

Abstract

Finessing Crystal Analysis: Protein crystallography has revolutionized our understanding of a whole variety of biological processes (see the Perspective by Evans ). In crystallography, the measure of agreement between the data and the calculated model is not on the same scale as the measure of data quality, making it challenging to choose an optimal high resolution limit beyond which the data should be discarded. Now, Karplus and Diederichs (p. 1030 ) introduce a statistical model that assesses agreement of model and data accuracy on the same scale. Determining the structures of biological macromolecules by x-ray crystallography requires solving the phase problem. The two techniques that dominate phase evaluation (multi- and single-wavelength anomalous diffraction) rely on element-specific scattering from incorporated heavy atoms. Liu et al. (p. 1033 ) present procedures for routine structure determination of native proteins with no heavy atom incorporation. The technique, which relies on combining data from multiple crystals, was used to determine the structures of four native proteins, including a 1200-residue complex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1218231

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The final resolution for the TrkA-minibinder data was selected as 1.84 Å by comparing paired refinements at 1.84, 1.90, 1.95, 2.00 and 2.05 Å.

    “The final resolution of the data was selected as 1.84 Å by comparing the results of paired refinements at 1.84, 1.90, 1.95, 2.00 and 2.05 Å resolution70.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karplus, P. A., & Diederichs, K.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Diederichs, Kay
Venue
Science
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
336
Issue
6084
Pages
1030-1033
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2108959691
Cited by
1,781
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 154 · 2016: 189 · 2015: 186 · 2014: 187 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 21
FWCI
74.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083136, GM083136)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-056649, R01DK056649)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Crystal structures of chemical compounds
Keywords
protein crystallography, model-data agreement, data quality, statistical models, anomalous diffraction, phase problem, macromolecular structure
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Research Design, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cysteine Dioxygenase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review