The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits
Abstract
Abstract Green credit financing (GCF) is a type of financial service provided by banks to encourage borrowers to commit green investment and achieve sustainable development. This study investigates a supply chain system consisting of a capital-constrained manufacturer and a well-funded supplier facing uncertain demand, in which the manufacturer may seek GCF from banks. An important prerequisite for obtaining a green loan is that the borrower must make green upgrades and ensure compliance with pre-specified environmental standards. We design a GCF model for a supply chain by imposing a hard constraint on carbon emissions. To determine the effectiveness of GCF, we conduct an in-depth analysis comparing the GCF with traditional trade credit financing (TCF), in which excessive carbon emissions are penalized. The optimal equilibrium solutions under GCF and TCF mode are obtained and their sensitivities to key parameters analyzed. Concerning the preferences of the two financing strategies, we find that under a relatively strict carbon emission policy, the manufacturer can set an appropriate green investment range to achieve a win-win situation with the supplier. Finally, we compare the social welfare of the supply chain for the different financing modes and find that there are regions in which both the social welfare and profit of the manufacturer can be a win-win. The government can guide manufacturers to make a win-win choice by setting different carbon caps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives
Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., & Hao, Y. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159 · Cited by 659
Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: evidence from China
Muganyi, T., Yan, L., & Sun, H.-P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2021.100107 · Cited by 626
Metadata
- Authors
- An, S., Li, B., Song, D., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-142
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096198253
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 57.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.025
- The paper
- An, S., Li, B., Song, D., & Chen, X. (2021). Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.