Cited by 659Sustainable Finance and Green BondsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthCorporate Finance and Governance

Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China

Zhang, Shengling, Wu, Zihao, Wang, Yao, Hao, Yu·2021·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

To direct financial resources to cleaner production enterprises and achieve the goal of environmental governance, the Chinese government has devoted increasing efforts to facilitating green finance. As one of the major policies of green finance, the Green Credit Policy (GCP) was issued in 2012. Evaluating whether the GCP can promote green development has important significance, but few studies have explored its policy effects for the investment and financing behavior of "two high" (high energy consumption and high pollution) enterprises and environmental quality from both micro and macro perspectives. Taking the promulgation of the GCP as a quasi-natural experiment, based on a panel dataset involving 945 A-share listed companies and 30 provinces for the period of 2004-2017, this paper adopts the difference-in-difference model to explore the investment and financing behavior changes of enterprises and environmental impacts of the GCP. The following conclusions are derived. (1) The GCP provides incentives for the short-term financing behavior of "two high" enterprises, but it has a punitive effect in the long term and significantly inhibits the investment behavior of such enterprises. (2) The GCP contributes to the mitigation of sulfur dioxide and wastewater emissions. (3) The GCP has a greater effect on investment and financing behavior among state-owned and large-scale "two high" enterprises than among medium-sized and micro enterprises. (4) There exists regional heterogeneity in the effects of the GCP on the investment and financing of "two high" enterprises and environmental quality. The GCP has positive impacts in the eastern and western regions, and the policy effect is not obvious in the central region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., & Hao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Hao, Yu
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
296
Pages
113159
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3180575985
Cited by
659
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 6
FWCI
89.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  • Beijing Social Science Fund (17JDYJA009)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71521002, 71761137001, 72073010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
green credit policy, green finance, green development, corporate investment behavior, corporate financing behavior, environmental quality, sulfur dioxide emissions, wastewater discharge, state-owned enterprises, regional heterogeneity, environmental governance, China
MeSH terms
Sustainable Development, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Policy, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review