The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network
Open accessAbstract
Consensus reaching process (CRP) is a dynamic and interactive method used to reach a group decision. Now that social networks and mobile internet are prominent features in daily life, more experts are able to take participate in decision making in the network and their opinions are influenced by others in the decision-making process. Therefore, how to use the difference of opinions and the relationships between experts to promote the consensus is an important issue. This paper proposed a CRP approach for large-scale group decision-making based on bounded confidence and social network to manage experts’ opinions. Firstly, a fast unfolding algorithm was used to reduce the dimension of the large-scale and the experts’ weights were obtained by social network analysis. Secondly, the CRP was built based on the Manhattan distance, and the feedback mechanism was developed to adjust experts’ opinions based on bounded confidence and social network when the experts did not reach a consensus. A numerical example was used to show the feasibility of the proposed approach and the results illustrated that the consensus speed was faster and the information managed more efficiently. The comparisons with other approaches showed the advantage of our proposed approach. Finally, simulation experiments were given to verify the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking
Yager, R. R. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.87068 · Cited by 7,289
An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation
Kanungo, T., Mount, D. M., Netanyahu, N. S., Piatko, C. D., Silverman, R., & Wu, A. Y. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017616 · Cited by 5,660
Graph Theory with Applications
Kay, E., Bondy, J. A., & Murty, U. S. R. (1977) · Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977) · doi:10.2307/3008805 · Cited by 2,992
The Centrality Index of a Graph
Sabidussi, G. (1966) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289527 · Cited by 2,476
A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures
Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., & Chiclana, F. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2002.802821 · Cited by 762
A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment
Herrera‐Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F. J., Kacprzyk, J., & Pedrycz, W. (2013) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002 · Cited by 712
Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L., Mata, F., & Chiclana, F. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2005.856561 · Cited by 638
Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges
Dong, Y., Zha, Q., Zhang, H., Kou, G., Fujita, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036 · Cited by 568
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Peng, Y.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 790-802
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220753524
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 39.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
- The paper
- Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.