The role of depression and catastrophizing in musculoskeletal pain
Abstract
Many patients with musculoskeletal pain also suffer from a depressed mood. Catastrophizing is one process that may link depression and pain since it is a key concept in models of both problems. Earlier research has suggested that catastrophizing measures something above and beyond depression. This study tests the idea that if depressed mood and catastrophizing are separate entities then when one is absent the other should still contribute to poor outcome, and, when both are present there should be an additional adverse effect. To this end, a prospective design, with a built‐in replication from two clinical samples of patients with sub‐acute pain (one from Sweden, N=373; one from Australasia, N=259), was employed. Participants were classified as to having high/low scores on measures of depression and catastrophizing. Subsequently, these classifications were studied in relation to outcome variables cross‐sectionally and at follow‐up. Results showed a small to moderate correlation between catastrophizing and depression and that there are individuals with one, but not the other problem. Further, having one or the other of the entities was associated with current pain problems and outcome, while having both increased the associations substantially. The replication showed very similar results Our data demonstrate that pain catastrophizing and heightened depressed mood have an additive and adverse effect on the impact of pain, relative to either alone. It suggests that each should be assessed in the clinic and that future research should focus on treatments specifically designed to tackle both depressed mood and catastrophizing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
About 20% of people with chronic pain have depression, compared with less than 7% of the general population, and this pattern is found worldwide.
“Approximately 20% of individuals with chronic pain also have depression, while less than 7% of the general population experiences this disorder, and these findings hold not just for the U.S. but around the world 231–235.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [231]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 198
- Authors
- Lintonl, S. J., Nicholasl, M. K., MacDonaldl, S., Boersmal, K., Bergboml, S., Maherl, C., & Refshaugel, K.
- Affiliations
- Örebro University (SE)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lintonl, Steven J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 416-422
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W1580122521
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- pain catastrophizing, depression, depressive mood, musculoskeletal pain, pain-related disability, pain outcomes, replication
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Asia, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fear, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Sweden, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Australasia, Catastrophization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review