Cited by 31Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

Lisdexamfetamine: A pharmacokinetic review

Comiran, Eloisa, Kessler, Félix Henrique, Fröehlich, Pedro Eduardo, Limberger, Renata Pereira·2016·European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a d-amphetamine (d-AMPH) pro-drug used to treat Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) symptoms. The in vivo pharmacodynamics of LDX is the same as that of its active product d-AMPH, although there are a few qualitative and quantitative differences due to pharmacokinetics. Due to the specific pharmacokinetics of the long-acting stimulants, this article revises the pharmacokinetic studies on LDX, the newest amphetamine pro-drug. The Medline/Pubmed, Science Direct and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Lilacs and Ibecs) (2007-2016) databases were searched for articles and their list of references. As for basic pharmacokinetics studies, since LDX is a newly developed medication, there are few results concerning biotransformation, distribution and the use of different biological matrices for analysis. This is the first robust review on this topic, gathering data from all clinical pharmacokinetics studies available in the literature. The particular pharmacokinetics of LDX plays a major role in studying this pro-drug, since this knowledge was essential to understand some reports on clinical effects in literature, e.g. the small likelihood of reducing the effect by interactions, the effect of long duration use and the still questionable reduction of the potential for abuse. In general the already well-known pharmacokinetic properties of amphetamine make LDX relatively predictable, simplifying the use of LDX in clinical…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.04.026

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comiran, E., Kessler, F. H., Fröehlich, P. E., & Limberger, R. P.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Comiran, Eloisa
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
89
Pages
172-179
ISSN
0928-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2392555149
Cited by
31
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)
  • Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine, pharmacokinetics, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, binge eating disorder, long-acting stimulants, biotransformation, drug distribution, biological matrices, drug interactions, abuse liability
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Biotransformation, Humans, Prodrugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review