Cited by 388Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques

Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation

Marlovits, Stefan, Zeller, Philip, Singer, Philipp, Resinger, Christoph, Vécsei, Vilmos·2006·European Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Articular cartilage in adults has a limited capacity for self-repair after a substantial injury. Surgical therapeutic efforts to treat cartilage defects have focused on delivering new cells capable of chondrogenesis into the lesions. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) is an advanced cell-based orthobiologic technology used for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee that has been in clinical use since 1987 and has been performed on 12,000 patients internationally. With ACT, good to excellent clinical results are seen in isolated post-traumatic lesions of the knee joint in the younger patient, with the formation of hyaline or hyaline-like repair tissue. In the classic ACT technique, chondrocytes are isolated from small slices of cartilage harvested arthroscopically from a minor weight-bearing area of the injured knee. The extracellular matrix is removed by enzymatic digestion, and the cells are then expanded in monolayer culture. Once a sufficient number of cells has been obtained, the chondrocytes are implanted into the cartilage defect, using a periosteal patch over the defect as a method of cell containment. The major complications are periosteal hypertrophy, delamination of the transplant, arthrofibrosis and transplant failure. Further improvements in tissue engineering have contributed to the next generation of ACT techniques, where cells are combined with resorbable biomaterials, as in matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). These…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marlovits, S., Zeller, P., Singer, P., Resinger, C., & Vécsei, V.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Marlovits, Stefan
Venue
European Journal of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
24-31
ISSN
0720-048X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125050513
Cited by
388
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Keywords
autologous chondrocyte implantation, articular cartilage repair, cartilage defects, knee joint, matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation, arthrofibrosis, cartilage tissue engineering, resorbable biomaterials, chondrogenesis
MeSH terms
Cartilage Diseases, Cartilage, Articular, Graft Rejection, Humans, Knee Injuries, Transplantation, Autologous, Cell Transplantation, Patient Selection, Orthopedic Procedures, Chondrocytes, Tissue Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review