Cited by 216Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Body composition in clinical practice

Open access
Andreoli, Angela, Garaci, Francesco, Cafarelli, Francesco Pio, Guglielmi, Giuseppe·2016·European Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Nutritional status is the results of nutrients intake, absorption and utilization, able to influence physiological and pathological conditions. Nutritional status can be measured for individuals with different techniques, such as CT Body Composition, quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Bioimpendance. Because obesity is becoming a worldwide epidemic, there is an increasing interest in the study of body composition to monitor conditions and delay in development of obesity-related diseases. The emergence of these evidence demonstrates the need of standard assessment of nutritional status based on body weight changes, playing an important role in several clinical setting, such as in quantitative measurement of tissues and their fluctuations in body composition, in survival rate, in pathologic condition and illnesses. Since body mass index has been shown to be an imprecise measurement of fat-free and fat mass, body cell mass and fluids, providing no information if weight changes, consequently there is the need to find a better way to evaluate body composition, in order to assess fat-free and fat mass with weight gain and loss, and during ageing. Monitoring body composition can be very useful for nutritional and medical interventional. This review is focused on the use of Body Composition in Clinical Practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are recognized as important nutritional problems that place older adults at higher risk of morbidity and mortality.

    “Both sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity, in which reduced FFM is combined with increased FM, are recognized as important nutritional problems that place older adults at higher risk of morbidity and mortality [2,29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreoli, A., Garaci, F., Cafarelli, F. P., & Guglielmi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Foggia (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
85
Issue
8
Pages
1461-1468
ISSN
0720-048X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2284534155
Cited by
216
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body composition, nutritional assessment, obesity, fat-free mass, fat mass, body cell mass, total body water, body mass index limitations, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance, quantitative MRI, obesity-related comorbidities, aging
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Body Composition, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Obesity, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review