Cited by 85Radiology practices and educationEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Trend in radiologist workload compared to number of admissions in the emergency department

Dan Lantsman, Christine, Barash, Yiftach, Klang, Eyal, Guranda, Larisa, Konen, Eli, Tau, Noam·2022·European Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Introduction Recent years have shown an increase in radiologists' workload, both during regular working hours and during on-call. We aimed to quantify the 8-year trend in on-call workload in a large tertiary academic medical center, and to compare the workload growth rate to emergency department (ED) visits growth rate during the same period.Methods The number of computed tomography (CT) studies during on-call hours (weekdays between 3.00 p.m. and 8.00 a.m., and weekends) between 2012 and 2019 was extracted from our hospital's Radiologic Information System. To estimate the on-call workload, all studies were converted to relative value units (RVUs) using the US Medicare physician reimbursement tables. The Kendall's tau b test was used to assess the temporal trend.Results Overall, on-call CT RVUs increased by 52% (Kendall's tau b = 0.776, p = 0.001) while ED visit rate grew by 23% with a weaker correlation coefficient (Kendall's tau b = 0.323, p = 0.009). RVUs of brain CT, the most prevalent examination type, increased by 33%, while abdominal CT, the second most prevalent examination, increased by 70%. Thoracic-lumbar spine CT examinations increased by 1375% and head and neck CT angiography examinations (stroke protocol and CT-Venography) grew by 287%.Conclusions Radiologists' on-call workload more than doubled the growth rate of ED visits over an 8-year period. Radiologists, radiographers and on-call ED workforce should be adjusted to accommodate these evolving changes to enhance quality and safety of patient care and to avoid caregivers' burnout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110195

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dan Lantsman, C., Barash, Y., Klang, E., Guranda, L., Konen, E., & Tau, N.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Barash, Yiftach
  • Klang, Eyal
  • Guranda, Larisa
  • Konen, Eli
  • Tau, Noam
Venue
European Journal of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
149
Pages
110195
ISSN
0720-048X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210584794
Cited by
85
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
radiologist workload, emergency department visits, computed tomography utilization, relative value units, temporal trends, brain CT, abdominal CT, spine CT, CT angiography, stroke protocol, CT venography, radiology workforce, burnout
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Radiologists, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Patient Admission, United States, Workload, After-Hours Care, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review