Cited by 47Medical Imaging and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

The role of Artificial intelligence in the assessment of the spine and spinal cord

Open access
Martín-Noguerol, Teodoro, Oñate Miranda, Marta, Amrhein, Timothy J., Paulano-Godino, Felix, Xiberta, Pau, Vilanova, Joan C, Luna, Antonio·2023·European Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) application development is underway in all areas of radiology where many promising tools are focused on the spine and spinal cord. In the past decade, multiple spine AI algorithms have been created based on radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These algorithms have wide-ranging purposes including automatic labeling of vertebral levels, automated description of disc degenerative changes, detection and classification of spine trauma, identification of osseous lesions, and the assessment of cord pathology. The overarching goals for these algorithms include improved patient throughput, reducing radiologist workload burden, and improving diagnostic accuracy. There are several pre-requisite tasks required in order to achieve these goals, such as automatic image segmentation, facilitating image acquisition and postprocessing. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the important imaging AI solutions that have been developed for the assessment of the spine and spinal cord. We focus on their practical applications and briefly discuss some key requirements for the successful integration of these tools into practice. The potential impact of AI in the imaging assessment of the spine and cord is vast and promises to provide broad reaching improvements for clinicians, radiologists, and patients alike.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110726

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systems such as AI-Rad Companion leverage natural language generation models to compose radiology reports automatically, highlighting potential abnormalities and issues for clinician review.

    “Systems such as AI-Rad Companion leverage natural language generation models to compose radiology reports automatically, highlighting potential abnormalities and issues for clinician review [20].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martín-Noguerol, T., Oñate Miranda, M., Amrhein, T. J., Paulano-Godino, F., Xiberta, P., Vilanova, J. C., & Luna, A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Universitat de Girona (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
161
Pages
110726
ISSN
0720-048X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319160002
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universitat de Girona
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
artificial intelligence, spinal imaging, spinal cord imaging, intervertebral disc degeneration, bone lesions, image segmentation, radiologist workload, diagnostic accuracy, clinical implementation of AI
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Radiology, Spinal Cord, Spine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review