Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A mini-review: How reliable is the drop casting technique?

Open access
Kaliyaraj Selva Kumar, Archana, Zhang, Yifei, Li, Danlei, Compton, Richard G.·2020·Electrochemistry Communications

Abstract

The simple, easy and rapid technique of “drop casting” is widely used to prepare the surface of chemically modified electrodes in which the modifying layer is composed of particles such as nanotubes or nanoparticles and used for electro-catalysis notably for chemical sensing as well as materials evaluation. However, meaningful voltammetry requires the formation of uniformly modified surfaces for which the coffee ring and its related effects, which are overviewed, present a significant limitation on the reproducibility of the drop casted surfaces. Approaches for amelioration of the coffee ring effect by various methods are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106867

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Kaliyaraj Selva Kumar, A., Zhang, Y., Li, D., & Compton, R. G.
Venue
Electrochemistry Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
121
Pages
106867
ISSN
1388-2481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3099166974
Cited by
405
References
1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mini-review: How reliable is the drop casting technique? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106867
The paper
Kaliyaraj Selva Kumar, A., Zhang, Y., Li, D., & Compton, R. G. (2020). A mini-review: How reliable is the drop casting technique? Electrochemistry Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.