CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance analysis of the ordered and the conventional catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Du, C.Y., Yang, T., Shi, P.F., Yin, G.P., Cheng, X.Q.·2006·Electrochimica Acta
DOI 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.047
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.047

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The detailed analysis indicated that the improved performance of the ordered catalyst layer can be primarily attributed to the uniform distributions of oxygen concentration and overpotential.

    “The detailed analysis indicated that the improved performance of the ordered catalyst layer can be primarily attributed to the uniform distributions of oxygen concentration and overpotential [253].”

    From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [253]

  • In 2006, they further proposed two steady-state one-dimensional models for the cathode catalyst layer, where the polarization curves were simulated, predicting a superior performance compared to the conventional catalyst layer model, even using lower Pt loadings.

    “In 2006, they further proposed two steady-state one-dimensional models for the cathode catalyst layer, where the polarization curves were simulated, predicting a superior performance compared to the conventional catalyst layer model, even using lower Pt loadings.”

    From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [253]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Uchida, 1995, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, 4143, 10.1149/1.2048477 · DOI
  2. Fischer, 1998, J. Appl. Electrochem., 28, 277, 10.1023/A:1003259531775 · DOI
  3. Ihonen, 2002, J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, A448, 10.1149/1.1456917 · DOI
  4. Wilson, 1992, J. Appl. Electrochem., 22, 1, 10.1007/BF01093004 · DOI
  5. Paganin, 1996, J. Appl. Electrochem., 26, 297, 10.1007/BF00242099 · DOI
  6. Qi, 2003, J. Power Sources, 113, 37, 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00477-9 · DOI
  7. Shin, 2002, J. Power Sources, 106, 146, 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01045-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. Litster, 2004, J. Power Sources, 130, 61, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.055 · DOI
  9. Middelman, 2002, Fuel Cells Bull., 9, 10.1016/S1464-2859(02)11028-5 · DOI
  10. Sun, 2005, Electrochim. Acta, 50, 3359, 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.009 · DOI
  11. Song, 2004, J. Power Sources, 126, 104, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.043 · DOI
  12. Broka, 1997, J. Appl. Electrochem., 27, 281, 10.1023/A:1018476612810 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Perry, 1998, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 5, 10.1149/1.1838202 · DOI
  14. Jaoueu, 2002, J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, A437, 10.1149/1.1456916 · DOI
  15. Song, 2005, Electrochim. Acta, 50, 3347, 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.008 · DOI
  16. Antoine, 2000, Electrochim. Acta, 45, 4493, 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00505-3 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2004, Electrochim. Acta, 50, 725, 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.113 · DOI
  18. Marr, 1999, J. Power Sources, 77, 17, 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00161-X · DOI
  19. Du, 2005, Electrochem. Commun., 7, 1411, 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gloaguen, 1997, J. Appl. Electrochem., 27, 1029, 10.1023/A:1018478324564 · DOI
  21. Boyer, 2000, J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, 777, 10.1023/A:1004088505222 · DOI
  22. Parthasarathy, 1992, J. Appl. J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 2530, 10.1149/1.2221258 · DOI
  23. Baschuk, 2000, J. Power Sources, 86, 181, 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00426-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Du, C. Y., Yang, T., Shi, P. F., Yin, G. P., & Cheng, X. Q.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, C.Y.
ORCID
Venue
Electrochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
51
Issue
23
Pages
4934-4941
ISSN
0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.047
OpenAlex
W1994672280
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Electrochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, catalyst layer, oxygen reduction reaction, Tafel kinetics, concentration polarization, overpotential distribution, oxygen diffusion, proton migration, platinum loading, polarization curves, one-dimensional model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review