Graphene Aerogel Supported Pt Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction by Supercritical Deposition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GA is an ideal substrate for constructing monodisperse Pt-based catalysts due to its interconnected 3D network structure and abundant surface defects.
“GA is an ideal substrate for constructing monodisperse Pt-based catalysts due to its interconnected 3D network structure and abundant surface defects [16–18].”
From Synergistic interaction of monodisperse Pt nanoparticles with defect‐rich graphene aerogel for efficient acidic hydrogen evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
SCD in combination with aerogels eliminates the risk of meso- and micropore deformation or collapse during impregnation of the Pt precursor and during depressurization, due to the absence of capillary forces in the supercritical state.
“SCD can be considered a particularly attractive technique in combination with aerogels, since the risk of meso- and micropore deformation or collapse during the impregnation of Pt precursor and during the depressurization is eliminated due to the absence of capillary forces in the supercritical state.[55–59]”
Cites
Sui, S., Wang, X., Zhou, X., Su, Y., Riffat, S., & Liu, C.-J. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta08580f · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Shao, M., Peles, A., & Shoemaker, K. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl2017459 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Uchida, M., Fukuoka, Y., Sugawara, Y., Eda, N., & Ohta, A. (1996) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1836988 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yao, H., Yu, X., Jia, Y., Zhang, J., Yao, J., Liu, J., Su, B., & Guo, X. (2025) · Rare Metals · doi:10.1007/s12598-024-03111-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Alsuhile, A., Pein, P. S., Barım, Ş. B., Bozbağ, S. E., Smirnova, I., Erkey, C., & Schroeter, B. (2025) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400433 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sarac Oztuna, F. E., Barim, S. B., Bozbag, S. E., Yu, H., Aindow, M., Unal, U., & Erkey, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Koç University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Erkey, Can
- Venue
- Electrochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 250
- Pages
- 174-184
- ISSN
- 0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2746253557
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electrochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Koç University Tüpraş Energy Center (KUTEM)
- Koç University Surface Science and Technology Center (KUYTAM)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Keywords
- graphene aerogel, platinum nanoparticles, oxygen reduction reaction, supercritical carbon dioxide, mesoporous carbon support, particle size distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
