The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion impedance of electroactive materials, electrolytic solutions and porous electrodes: Warburg impedance and beyond
Abstract
Abstract The diffusion coefficient is a key property of materials. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a routine tool to determine the diffusion coefficient. Albeit being versatile for varied electrochemical systems and powerful in distinguishing multiple processes in a wide frequency spectrum, the EIS method usually needs a physical model in data analysis; misuse of models leads researchers to provide unwarranted interpretation of EIS data. Regarding diffusion, the simple and elegant formula developed by Warburg has been serving as the canonical model for more than a century. The classical Warburg model has very strict assumptions, however, it is used in a wide range of scenarios where assumptions may not be satisfied. It is the main purpose of the present article to define the boundary of applicability of the Warburg model and develop alternative models for cases beyond the boundary. In so doing, the Warburg model is revisited and its limitations and assumptions are scrutinized. Afterwards, new impedance models for more complicated and realistic scenarios are developed. The present article features: (1) generalization of the boundary condition when treating diffusion in bounded space and geometrical variants; (2) diffusion impedance in porous electrodes and fractals; (3) the effect of electrostatic interactions and coupling between diffusion and migration on the diffusion impedance in electrolytic solutions; (4) introduction of homotopy perturbation method to treat the convective diffusion; (5) physical interpretations of diffusion impedance behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach
Metzler, R., & Klafter, J. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00070-3 · Cited by 9,026
Theory of the Impedance of Electron Diffusion and Recombination in a Thin Layer
Bisquert, J. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp011941g · Cited by 1,361
Application of A‐C Techniques to the Study of Lithium Diffusion in Tungsten Trioxide Thin Films
Ho, C., Raistrick, I. D., & Huggins, R. A. (1980) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2129668 · Cited by 1,241
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and its Applications
Lasia, A. (2005) · Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/0-306-46916-2_2 · Cited by 1,214
Diffuse-charge dynamics in electrochemical systems
Bazant, M. Z., Thornton, K., & Ajdari, A. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.021506 · Cited by 1,053
On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions
de Levie, R. (1963) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(63)80042-0 · Cited by 974
Determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium in LiFePO4
Prosini, P. (2002) · Solid State Ionics · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(02)00134-0 · Cited by 844
On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions—IV
de Levie, R. (1964) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(64)85015-5 · Cited by 672
Levi, M. D., Salitra, G., Markovsky, B., Teller, H., Aurbach, D., Heider, U., & Heider, L. (1999) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1391759 · Cited by 644
Theory of the electrochemical impedance of anomalous diffusion
Bisquert, J., & Compte, A. (2001) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(00)00497-6 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
Wang, X., Wei, X., Zhu, J., Dai, H., Zheng, Y., Xu, X., & Chen, Q. (2021) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2020.100093 · Cited by 451
Wu, Z., Ding, Q., Li, Z., Zhou, Z., Luo, L., Tao, K., Xie, X., & Wu, J. (2022) · Science China Materials · doi:10.1007/s40843-021-2022-1 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J.
- Venue
- Electrochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 281
- Pages
- 170-188
- ISSN
- 0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803833507
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion impedance of electroactive materials, electrolytic solutions and porous electrodes: Warburg impedance and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.136
- The paper
- Huang, J. (2018). Diffusion impedance of electroactive materials, electrolytic solutions and porous electrodes: Warburg impedance and beyond. Electrochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.