Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative study of global optimization methods for parameter identification of different equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries

Lai, Xin, Gao, Wenkai, Zheng, Yuejiu, Ouyang, Minggao, Li, Jianqiu, Han, Xuebing, Zhou, Long·2019·Electrochimica Acta

Abstract

Abstract A suitable model structure and matched model parameters are prerequisites for the precise estimation of the battery states. Previous studies pay little attention to whether a parameter identification method is suitable for a model. In this study, a comparative study is conducted by implementing model parameter optimization for nine equivalent circuit models using nine optimizers in the entire SOC area. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) PNGV and the exact algorithms are an ideal combination in the low SOC area (0%–20%). (2) In the high SOC area (20–100%), exact algorithms are an ideal choice for the first-order RC models, and PSO is an ideal identification algorithm for second-order RC models. For the third- and fourth-order RC models, firefly algorithm has the highest accuracy with longer identification time. (3) Firefly algorithm has the superior capacity to identify the accurate model parameters and PSO has the best comprehensive performance for on-line parameter identification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.134

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Lai, X., Gao, W., Zheng, Y., Ouyang, M., Li, J., Han, X., & Zhou, L.
Venue
Electrochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
295
Pages
1057-1066
ISSN
0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900825030
Cited by
265
References
32
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative study of global optimization methods for parameter identification of different equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.134
The paper
Lai, X., Gao, W., Zheng, Y., Ouyang, M., Li, J., Han, X., & Zhou, L. (2019). A comparative study of global optimization methods for parameter identification of different equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.