Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on prognostics and health management (PHM) methods of lithium-ion batteries

Meng, Huixing, Li, Yan-Fu·2019·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Batteries are prevalent energy providers for modern systems. They can also be regarded as storage units for renewable and sustainable energy. Failures of batteries can bring huge losses in terms of personnel, facility, environment, and reputation aspects. Therefore the accurate health estimation and high availability of batteries is urgently required by corresponding users, distributors, and manufactures. Fortunately, prognostics and health management (PHM) technique has been demonstrated the capability of supporting the improvement of the availability and reliability of batteries. In this paper, we gave a review on the state-of-the-art of the PHM study on batteries. We observed the increase of publication related to battery PHM in the past decade (2009–2018), especially in the past five years. Approaches related to battery performance prognostics are categorized into physics-based, data-driven and hybrid classes. Selection of the battery PHM approach requires to take the user requirement, data availability and degradation mechanisms attainability into consideration. Based on the survey, we also proposed research and development perspectives to conduct further studies on the battery PHM, including the approach selection, health management, performance evaluation, uncertainty treatment, application economics, as well as environmental issues. We focused on PHM of lithium-ion batteries, given the fact that several publications discussed other types of batteries (e.g., lead-acid batteries).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109405

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Meng, H., & Li, Y.-F.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
116
Pages
109405
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975620261
Cited by
389
References
140
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on prognostics and health management (PHM) methods of lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109405
The paper
Meng, H., & Li, Y.-F. (2019). A review on prognostics and health management (PHM) methods of lithium-ion batteries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.