Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gaussian process distribution of relaxation times: A machine learning tool for the analysis and prediction of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data

Open access
Liu, Jiapeng, Ciucci, Francesco·2020·Electrochimica Acta

Abstract

Abstract Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is one of the most important techniques in electrochemistry. However, analyzing the EIS data is not a simple task. The distribution of relaxation times (DRT) method offers an elegant solution to this considerable challenge. In addition to that, the DRT method can be used to obtain the time characteristics of the electrochemical system under study. Though, deconvolving the DRT from the EIS data is an ill-posed problem, which is particularly sensitive to experimental errors. Several well-known approaches, including ridge regularization, can overcome this issue but they all require the use of ad hoc hyperparameters. Furthermore, most methods are not probabilistic and therefore do not provide any uncertainty on the estimated DRT. In this work, by assuming that the DRT is a Gaussian process (GP), it is not only possible to obtain the DRT mean and covariance from the EIS data but also to predict both the DRT and the imaginary part of the impedance at frequencies not previously measured. One important point to note is that, unlike other methods, the parameters that define the GP-DRT model can be selected rationally by maximizing the experimental evidence. The GP-DRT approach is tested using synthetic experiments for analyzing the consistency of the method and “real” experiments to gauge its performance for real data. The GP-DRT model is shown to be able to manage considerable noise, overlapping timescales, truncated data, and inductive features. Considering the GP-DRT framework developed and the results of the simulations, the GP-DRT will likely inspire further studies on using a probabilistic approach to interpret EIS data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135316

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., & Ciucci, F.
Venue
Electrochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
331
Pages
135316
ISSN
0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991224188
Cited by
200
References
4
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gaussian process distribution of relaxation times: A machine learning tool for the analysis and prediction of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135316
The paper
Liu, J., & Ciucci, F. (2020). The Gaussian process distribution of relaxation times: A machine learning tool for the analysis and prediction of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data. Electrochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135316

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.