Cited by 121Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationEuropean Union Policy and GovernancePolitical Theory and Democracy

The Legacy of Lethargy: How Elections to the European Parliament Depress Turnout

Franklin, Mark N., Hobolt, Sara B.·2011·Electoral Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franklin, M. N., & Hobolt, S. B.
Affiliations
  • European University Institute (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Hobolt, Sara B.
Venue
Electoral Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
67-76
ISSN
0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020111339
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
35.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electoral Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
European Parliament elections, voter turnout, voter apathy, political participation, second-order elections, regression discontinuity design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review