The Legacy of Lethargy: How Elections to the European Parliament Depress Turnout
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elections of low salience can end up being demobilising for young people.
“Those who experienced a highly salient first election when coming of age have been found to have higher rates of turnout in later life (Dinas, 2012) and elections of low salience can end up being demobilising for young people (Franklin and Hobolt, 2011).”
From How Young People in Scotland Experience the Right to Vote at 16: Evidence on ‘Votes-at-16’ in Scotland from Qualitative Work with Young People (2021) · cites this paper as Franklin and Hobolt, 2011
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Formation of Voting Habits
Dinas, E. (2012) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.718280 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
First-Time Boost Beats Experience: The Effect of past Eligibility on Turnout
Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K. M., & Wass, H. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.005 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Huebner, C. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab017 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Those who experienced a highly salient first election when coming of age have been found to have higher rates of turnout in later life (Dinas, 2012) and elections of low salience can end up being demobilising for young people (Franklin and Hobolt, 2011).”
- Authors
- Franklin, M. N., & Hobolt, S. B.
- Affiliations
- European University Institute (IT)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hobolt, Sara B.
- Venue
- Electoral Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-76
- ISSN
- 0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020111339
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 35.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electoral Studies (publishedVersion)
- Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- European Parliament elections, voter turnout, voter apathy, political participation, second-order elections, regression discontinuity design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review