CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

First-Time Boost Beats Experience: The Effect of past Eligibility on Turnout

Bhatti, Yosef, Hansen, Kasper M., Wass, Hanna·2016·Electoral Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experience of voting age reform and even just the act of enfranchisement itself can constitute a 'life event' or 'hype' big enough to shape young people's engagement in elections.

    “Others argue that the experience of voting age reform and even just the act of enfranchisement itself can constitute a 'life event' (Zeglovits and Zandonella, 2013) or 'hype' (Bhatti et al., 2016) big enough to shape young people's engagement in elections.”

    From How Young People in Scotland Experience the Right to Vote at 16: Evidence on ‘Votes-at-16’ in Scotland from Qualitative Work with Young People (2021) · cites this paper as Bhatti et al., 2016

  • Some participants directly attributed their feeling of empowerment to the introduction of 'Votes-at-16', supporting the idea that enfranchisement itself, and certainly the lowering of the voting age, can constitute a uniquely mobilising 'life event'.

    “Some participants directly attributed this feeling of empowerment to the introduction of 'Votes-at-16', supporting the idea that enfranchisement itself, and certainly the lowering of the voting age, can constitute a uniquely mobilising 'life event' (Zeglovits and Zandonella, 2013; see also Bhatti et al. , 2016).”

    From How Young People in Scotland Experience the Right to Vote at 16: Evidence on ‘Votes-at-16’ in Scotland from Qualitative Work with Young People (2021) · cites this paper as Bhatti et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K. M., & Wass, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Wass, Hanna
ORCID
Venue
Electoral Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
41
Pages
151-158
ISSN
0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.005
OpenAlex
W2188015733
Cited by
32
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Electoral Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (273433)
  • Danish Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Interior
  • Danish Council for Independent Research (12-1 24983)
  • Danish Youth Council, the Danish Ministry of Children, Gender Equality, Integration and Social Affairs
  • Danish Council for Ethnic Minorities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
first-time voters, young voters, voter turnout, voting experience, Denmark, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review