Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competition, cooperation, and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem

Open access
Liu, Jun, Kauffman, Robert J., Ma, Dan·2015·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Abstract

Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted Considers competition and regulation in technology ecosystem paths of influence model.Analyzes mobile payments technology evolution to empirically test this approach.Contributes a new analysis approach useful for many other settings of financial services.Analyzes the paths of influence that led to different patterns of m-payments evolution.Identifies key accelerators and decelerators that affect technological changes. The past twenty years have been a time of many new technological developments, changing business practices, and interesting innovations in the financial information system (IS) and technology landscape. They have led to the increasing use of prior innovations that have supported e-commerce, and that are now being brought into financial services to support different kinds of improvements to core business processes. This research examines recent changes in the payment sector in financial services, specifically related to mobile payments (m-payments) that enable new channels for consumer payments for goods and services purchases, and other forms of economic exchange. We extend recent research on technology ecosystems and paths of influence analysis for how industry-centered technology innovations arise and evolve. We explore the extent to which they can be understood through the lens of several simple building blocks, including technology components, technology-based services, and the technology-supported infrastructures that provide foundations for the related digital businesses. Our extension of the prior research focuses on two key elements: (1) modeling the impacts of competition and cooperation on different forms of innovations in the aforementioned building blocks; and (2) representing the role that regulatory forces play in driving or delaying innovation in the larger scope of our modeling approach. To assess the efficacy of our approach, we use it to retrospectively analyze the past two decades of innovations in the m-payments space. Our results identify the industry-specific patterns of innovation that have occurred, suggest how they have been affected by competition, cooperation and regulation, and point out some more universal patterns of technology innovations that offer insights into the development of e-commerce.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.03.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Design Science in Information Systems Research1

    Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 1×

    “Given the complex structure of the m-payments ecosystem and limited sources of quantitative data, we decided to adopt a qualitative analysis approach (Miles and Huberman 1994, Sarker et al. 2013, Strauss and Corbin 1998), following guidelines described by Hevner et al. (2004).”
    Method
  • Design science in information systems research

    (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Kauffman, R. J., & Ma, D.
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
372-391
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075542346
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
41.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition, cooperation, and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.03.003
The paper
Liu, J., Kauffman, R. J., & Ma, D. (2015). Competition, cooperation, and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.03.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.