Cited by 36Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Message framing and acceptance of branchless banking technology

Kurila, Jonila, Lazuras, Lambros, Ketikidis, Panagiotis H.·2016·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2016.02.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UTAUT and UTAUT2 models have been widely used to study acceptance of e-banking, indicating that performance expectancy, facilitating conditions and trust are important to the acceptance of e-banking.

    “The UTAUT and UTAUT2 models have been widely used to study acceptance of e-banking, indicating that performance expectancy, facilitating conditions and trust are important to the acceptance of e-banking”

    From E-banking in Colombia: factors favouring its acceptance, online trust and government support (2018) · cites this paper as Kurila, Lazuras, & Ketikidis, 2016

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 36

Authors
Kurila, J., Lazuras, L., & Ketikidis, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lazuras, Lambros
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
17
Pages
12-18
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289503638
Cited by
36
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
message framing, branchless banking, mobile banking, technology acceptance, UTAUT, intention to use, performance expectancy, gain frame, loss frame, gender differences, technology acceptance model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review