Cited by 1,038Digital Marketing and Social MediaTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective.

Sun, Yuan, Shao, Xiang, Li, Xiaotong, Guo, Yue, Nie, Kun·2019·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang Gongshang University (CN)
  • University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Xiaotong
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
37
Pages
100886
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968719209
Cited by
1,038
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 15
FWCI
119.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
Zhejiang Gongshang University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
live streaming shopping, social commerce, purchase intention, IT affordances, Chinese consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review