Cited by 33AI in Service InteractionsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyRobotics and Automated Systems

Humanoid robotics and agentic AI: reframing management theories and future research directions

Korzynski, Pawel, Edwards, Autumn, Gupta, Mahesh C., Mazurek, Grzegorz, Wirtz, Jochen·2025·European Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korzynski, P., Edwards, A., Gupta, M. C., Mazurek, G., & Wirtz, J.
Affiliations
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Kozminski University (PL)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Edwards, Autumn
  • Gupta, Mahesh C.
  • Mazurek, Grzegorz
  • Wirtz, Jochen
Venue
European Management Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
548-560
ISSN
0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411241548
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 7
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
humanoid robots, AI agents, physical AI, embodied AI, management theory, human resource management, social learning theory, value co-creation, service-dominant logic, trust, operations management, workflow automation, human-machine collaboration, machine agency, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review