Cited by 53Technology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service InteractionsCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Intention to adopt services by AI avatar: A protection motivation theory perspective

Park, Jungkun, Yun, Jeewoo, Chang, Woondeog·2024·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103929

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of GAI, heightened concerns about privacy breaches can prompt users to adopt safeguarding measures, such as restricting data input or adjusting privacy settings.

    “In the context of GAI, heightened concerns about privacy breaches can prompt users to adopt safeguarding measures, such as restricting data input or adjusting privacy settings (Park et al. 2024).”

    From Bridging risk and retention: risk coping with privacy and hallucination in AI (2026) · cites this paper as Park et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J., Yun, J., & Chang, W.
Affiliations
Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yun, Jeewoo
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
80
Pages
103929
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399068475
Cited by
51
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
FWCI
19.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
AI avatars, protection motivation theory, technology acceptance model, service trust, COVID-19 pandemic, threat appraisal, coping appraisal, perceived response efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review