The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions – Properties, requirements and possibilities
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The advantages and disadvantages of the thermal building insulation materials and solutions have been treated. Both traditional, state-of-the-art and possible materials and solutions beyond these have been investigated. Examples of these may be mineral wool, expanded polystyrene, extruded polystyrene, polyurethane, vacuum insulation panels, gas insulation panels, aerogels, and future possibilities like vacuum insulation materials, nano insulation materials and dynamic insulation materials. Various properties, requirements and possibilities have been compared and studied. Among these are thermal conductivity, perforation vulnerability, building site adaptability and cuttability, mechanical strength, fire protection, fume emission during fire, robustness, climate ageing durability, resistance towards freezing/thawing cycles, water resistance, costs and environmental impact. Currently, there exist no single insulation material or solution capable of fulfilling all the requirements with respect to the most crucial properties. That is, for the buildings of today and the near future, several insulation materials and solutions are used and will have to be used depending on the exact circumstances and specifications. As of today, new materials and solutions like e.g. vacuum insulation panels are emerging, but only slowly introduced in the building sector partly due to their short track record. Therefore it will be of major importance to know the limitations and possibilities of all the insulation materials and solutions, i.e. their advantages and disadvantages. In this respect new conceptual thermal building insulation materials are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thermal conductivity of concrete – A review
Asadi, I., Shafigh, P., Abu Hassan, Z. F. B., & Mahyuddin, N. B. (2018) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.002 · Cited by 803
Thermally Insulating Nanocellulose‐Based Materials
Apostolopoulou‐Kalkavoura, V., Munier, P., & Bergström, L. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202001839 · Cited by 394
Recent Developments in Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Thermal Applications: A Review
Ahankari, S., Paliwal, P., Subhedar, A., & Kargarzadeh, H. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09678 · Cited by 281
Pohoryles, D. A., Maduta, C., Bournas, D. A., & Kouris, L. A. (2020) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110024 · Cited by 185
Passive alternatives to mechanical air conditioning of building: A review
Samuel, D. G. L., Nagendra, S. M. S., & Maiya, M. P. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.04.016 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Jelle, B. P.
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2549-2563
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065402459
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions – Properties, requirements and possibilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.015
- The paper
- Jelle, B. P. (2011). Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions – Properties, requirements and possibilities. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.