Cited by 171Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationEnergy Load and Power ForecastingSmart Grid Energy Management

Unsupervised energy prediction in a Smart Grid context using reinforcement cross-building transfer learning

Open access
Mocanu, Elena, Nguyen, Phuong H., Kling, Wil L., Gibescu, Madeleine·2016·Energy and Buildings

Abstract

• We propose a new prediction method to model building energy consumption in Smart Grid. • It incorporates deep learning into reinforcement learning for continuous states estimation. • The learned model is transferred to a new building to predict energy consumption. • The method is validated on a real database recorded over seven years, with hourly resolution. In a future Smart Grid context, increasing challenges in managing the stochastic local energy supply and demand are expected. This increased the need of more accurate energy prediction methods in order to support further complex decision-making processes. Although many methods aiming to predict the energy consumption exist, all these require labelled data, such as historical or simulated data. Still, such datasets are not always available under the emerging Smart Grid transition and complex people behaviour. Our approach goes beyond the state-of-the-art energy prediction methods in that it does not require labelled data. Firstly, two reinforcement learning algorithms are investigated in order to model the building energy consumption. Secondly, as a main theoretical contribution, a Deep Belief Network (DBN) is incorporated into each of these algorithms, making them suitable for continuous states. Thirdly, the proposed methods yield a cross-building transfer that can target new behaviour of existing buildings (due to changes in their structure or installations), as well as completely new types of buildings. The methods are developed in the MATLAB ® environment and tested on a real database recorded over seven years, with hourly resolution. Experimental results demonstrate that the energy prediction accuracy in terms of RMSE has been significantly improved in 91.42% of the cases after using a DBN for automatically extracting high-level features from the unlabelled data, compared to the equivalent methods without the DBN pre-processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.030

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mocanu et al. modeled building load profiles with RL and deep belief networks and used transfer learning to predict new buildings.

    “For instance, Mocanu et al. [544] modeled building load profiles with RL and deep belief networks using data on commercial and residential buildings; they then used approximate RL and transfer learning to make predictions about new buildings, enabling the transfer of knowledge from commercial to residential buildings, and from gas-to power-heated buildings.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [544]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M. Krarti, Energy Audit of Building Systems: An Engineering Approach, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Series, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mocanu, E., Nguyen, P. H., Kling, W. L., & Gibescu, M.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Mocanu, Elena
Venue
Energy and Buildings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
116
Pages
646-655
ISSN
0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2281071090
Cited by
171
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
NL Enterprise Agency RVO.nl
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
building energy consumption prediction, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning, deep belief network, smart grid, load forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review