Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study on deep reinforcement learning techniques for building energy consumption forecasting

Liu, Tao, Tan, Zehan, Xu, Chengliang, Chen, Huanxin, Li, Zhengfei·2020·Energy and Buildings

Abstract

Abstract Reliable and accurate building energy consumption prediction is becoming increasingly pivotal in building energy management. Currently, data-driven approach has shown promising performances and gained lots of research attention due to its efficiency and flexibility. As a combination of reinforcement learning and deep learning, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) techniques are expected to solve nonlinear and complex issues. However, very little is known about DRL techniques in forecasting building energy consumption. Therefore, this paper presents a case study of an office building using three commonly-used DRL techniques to forecast building energy consumption, namely Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C), Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) and Recurrent Deterministic Policy Gradient (RDPG). The objective is to investigate the potential of DRL techniques in building energy consumption prediction field. A comprehensive comparison between DRL models and common supervised models is also provided. The results demonstrate that the proposed DDPG and RDPG models have obvious advantages in forecasting building energy consumption compared to common supervised models, while accounting for more computation time for model training. Their prediction performances measured by mean absolute error (MAE) can be improved by 16%-24% for single-step ahead prediction, and 19%-32% for multi-step ahead prediction. The results also indicate that A3C performs poor prediction accuracy and shows much slower convergence speed than DDPG and RDPG. However, A3C is still the most efficient technique among these three DRL methods. The findings are enlightening and the proposed DRL methodologies can be positively extended to other prediction problems, e.g., wind speed prediction and electricity load prediction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109675

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Liu, T., Tan, Z., Xu, C., Chen, H., & Li, Z.
Venue
Energy and Buildings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
208
Pages
109675
ISSN
0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994209110
Cited by
274
References
8
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on deep reinforcement learning techniques for building energy consumption forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109675
The paper
Liu, T., Tan, Z., Xu, C., Chen, H., & Li, Z. (2020). Study on deep reinforcement learning techniques for building energy consumption forecasting. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.