Cited by 99Building energy efficiency and sustainabilityBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationLife Cycle Costing Analysis

Cost-effectiveness of large-scale deep energy retrofit packages for residential buildings under different economic assessment approaches

Open access
Streicher, Kai Nino, Mennel, Stefan, Chambers, Jonathan, Parra, David, Patel, Martin K.·2020·Energy and Buildings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109870

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Streicher, K. N., Mennel, S., Chambers, J., Parra, D., & Patel, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Lucerne (CH)
Corresponding author
Streicher, Kai Nino
Venue
Energy and Buildings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
215
Pages
109870
ISSN
0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006238653
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 6
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Geneva (1155002539)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
Keywords
deep energy retrofit, residential buildings, cost-effectiveness, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, energy saving potential, building stock, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review