The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Postcombustion CO 2 capture is the best suitable capture technology for existing coal power plants. This paper focuses on an emerging technology that involves the separation of CO 2 using the reversible carbonation reaction of CaO to capture CO 2 from the flue gas, and the calcination of CaCO 3 to regenerate the sorbent and produce concentrated CO 2 for storage. We describe the application to this concept to an existing (with today’s technology) power plant. The added capture system incorporates a new supercritical steam cycle to take advantage of the large amount of heat coming out from the high temperature capture process (oxyfired combustion of coal is needed in the CaCO 3 calciner). In these conditions, the capture system is able to generate additional power (26.7% efficiency respect to LHV coal input to the calciner after accounting for all the penalties in the overall system), without disturbing the steam cycle of the reference plant (that retains its 44.9 efficiency). A preliminary cost study of the overall system, using well established analogues in the open literature for the main components, yields capture cost around 16 €/ton CO 2 avoided and incremental cost of electricity of just over 1 €/MW h e.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An apparent kinetic model for the carbonation of calcium oxide by carbon dioxide
Lee, D. K. (2004) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2003.12.003 · Cited by 214
Cited by
The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture
Blamey, J., Anthony, E. J., Wang, J., & Fennell, P. S. (2010) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,044
Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture
Kenarsari, S. D., Yang, D., Jiang, G., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Russell, A. G., Wei, Q., & Fan, M. (2013) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c3ra43965h · Cited by 784
Dean, C. C., Blamey, J., Florin, N. H., Al-Jeboori, M. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.013 · Cited by 375
Calcium looping sorbents for CO2 capture
Erans, M., Manovic, V., & Anthony, E. J. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.074 · Cited by 369
Perejón, A., Romeo, L. M., Lara, Y., Lisbona, P., Martínez, A., & Valverde, J. M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.121 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Romeo, L. M., Abanades, J. C., Escosa, J. M., Paño, J., Giménez, A., Sánchez-Biezma, A., & Ballesteros, J. C.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2809-2814
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968811971
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.022
- The paper
- Romeo, L. M., Abanades, J. C., Escosa, J. M., Paño, J., Giménez, A., Sánchez-Biezma, A., & Ballesteros, J. C. (2008). Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
