Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 96Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementWood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technical and economic assessment for the production of torrefied ligno-cellulosic biomass pellets in the US

Pirraglia, Adrian, Gonzalez, Ronalds, Saloni, Daniel, Denig, Joseph·2013·Energy Conversion and Management

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.09.024

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Lipinsky, 2002, Enhanced wood fuels via torrefaction, Fuel Chem Div Preprint, 47, 408
  2. Boyd T, de Vries D, Kempthorne H, Wearing J, Wolff I. Mass & energy balance for torrefied pellet production. UBC biomass pelletization workshop; 2011. <http://www.biomass.ubc.ca/docs/NORAM%20UBC%20Biomass%20Presentation%20May%202011%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf> [consulted 02.14.12].
  3. Gonzalez R, Saloni D, Phillips R, Wright J. Loblolly pine biomass delivered cost, biomass conference, Minneapolis, MN; 2010.
  4. Kallio M. Critical review on the pelletizing technology. Intell Energy Eur; 2011. <http://www.mixbiopells.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/WP3/D3.1_Overwiev_Production_Final.pdf> [consulted 02.12.12].
  5. Baez MA. Highly efficient hydrolytic enzymes for the development of value-added products from DDGS. International distillers grains. In: Conference and trade show, Minneapolis, MN; 12–14 September 2006.
  6. Bergman PCA, Kiel JHA. Torrefaction for biomass upgrading. In: 14th European biomass conference & exhibition, Paris, France, 17–21 October 2005. <http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009_energypolicy/documents/2009-04-21_workshop/comments/Torrefaction_for_Biomass_Upgrading_TN-51257.PDF> [consulted 01.06.12].
  7. Adapa, 2010, Pelleting characteristics of selected biomass with and without steam explosion pretreatment, Int J Agric Biol Eng, 3, 62
  8. Cerezo LM. Biomass torrefaction workshop, EPRI’s biomass R&D. Pre-treatment technologies update. Electric Power Research Institute; 2011.

Cited by

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Pirraglia, A., Gonzalez, R., Saloni, D., & Denig, J.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pirraglia, Adrian
Venue
Energy Conversion and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
66
Pages
153-164
ISSN
0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979835400
Cited by
96
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Energy Conversion and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
Keywords
torrefaction, wood pellets, lignocellulosic biomass, techno-economic analysis, capital expenditure, binders, carbon credits, scale-up, biomass energy, coal substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.