The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review on recent size optimization methodologies for standalone solar and wind hybrid renewable energy system
Open accessAbstract
Electricity demand in remote and island areas are generally supplied by diesel or other fossil fuel based generation systems. Nevertheless, due to the increasing cost and harmful emissions of fossil fuels there is a growing trend to use standalone hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs). Due to the complementary characteristics, matured technologies and availability in most areas, hybrid systems with solar and wind energy have become the popular choice in such applications. However, the intermittency and high net present cost are the challenges associated with solar and wind energy systems. In this context, optimal sizing is a key factor to attain a reliable supply at a low cost through these standalone systems. Therefore, there has been a growing interest to develop algorithms for size optimization in standalone HRESs. The optimal sizing methodologies reported so far can be broadly categorized as classical algorithms, modern techniques and software tools. Modern techniques, based on single artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, are becoming more popular than classical algorithms owing to their capabilities in solving complex optimization problems. Moreover, in recent years, there has been a clear trend to use hybrid algorithms over single algorithms mainly due to their ability to provide more promising optimization results. This paper aims to present a comprehensive review on recent developments in size optimization methodologies, as well as a critical comparison of single algorithms, hybrid algorithms, and software tools used for sizing standalone solar and wind HRES. In addition, an evaluation of all the possible combinations of standalone solar and wind energy systems, including their assessment parameters of economical, reliability, environmental, and social aspects, are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda
Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104 · Cited by 1,203
Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe
Caglayan, D. G., Weber, N., Heinrichs, H. U., Linßen, J., Robinius, M., Kukla, P. A., & Stolten, D. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161 · Cited by 733
Serban, A. C., & Lytras, M. D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990123 · Cited by 300
Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Xing, C., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100195 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-falahi, M. D. A., Jayasinghe, S. D. G., & Enshaei, H.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 252-274
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2607491490
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on recent size optimization methodologies for standalone solar and wind hybrid renewable energy system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.019
- The paper
- Al-falahi, M. D. A., Jayasinghe, S. D. G., & Enshaei, H. (2017). A review on recent size optimization methodologies for standalone solar and wind hybrid renewable energy system. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.