Cited by 645

Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe

Caglayan, Dilara Gulcin, Weber, Nikolaus, Heinrichs, Heidi U., Linßen, Jochen, Robinius, Martin, Kukla, Peter A., Stolten, Detlef·2020·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Published version of a preprint

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underground cavern and porous storage energy potentials vary substantially across countries, including newly built and retrofitted storage facilities from natural gas infrastructure.

    “Underground cavern and porous storage energy potentials vary substantially across countries, including newly built and retrofitted storage facilities from natural gas infrastructure98,110.”
  • Methanol-based long-duration storage does not depend on highly localized underground sites but allows for aboveground storage that can generally be placed anywhere, which could lead to spatial redistribution of least-cost storage capacity.

    “This technology does not depend on highly localized underground sites but allows for aboveground storage that can generally be placed anywhere98,110, which could lead to spatial redistribution of least-cost storage capacity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caglayan, D. G., Weber, N., Heinrichs, H. U., Linßen, J., Robinius, M., Kukla, P. A., & Stolten, D.
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
6793-6805
ISSN
0360-3199
Cited by
645
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Helmholtz Association

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review