CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cathode catalyst layer design with gradients of ionomer distribution for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Shahgaldi, Samaneh, Ozden, Adnan, Li, Xianguo, Hamdullahpur, Feridun·2018·Energy Conversion and Management
DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changing the ionomer content, Pt loading, and both has been investigated to build a multilayer/gradient catalyst layer.

    “To build a multilayer/gradient catalyst layer, changing the ionomer content [269], Pt loading [249], and both [270] has been investigated.”

    From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [269]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Qin, 2017, Study on the operating pressure effect on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell power system, Energy Convers Manag, 142, 357, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.035 · DOI
  2. Zehtabiyan-Rezaie, 2017, Effect of flow field with converging and diverging channels on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance, Energy Convers Manag, 152, 31, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.009 · DOI
  3. Zhang, 2017, Using electrochemical cycles to efficiently exploit the waste heat from a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Energy Convers Manag, 144, 217, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.058 · DOI
  4. Fan, 2017, Characteristics of PEMFC operating at high current density with low external humidification, Energy Convers Manag, 150, 763, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.034 · DOI
  5. Yin, 2016, Numerical investigation of an ejector for anode recirculation in proton exchange membrane fuel cell system, Energy Convers Manag, 126, 1106, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.024 · DOI
  6. Shahgaldi, 2015, Stability study of ultra-low Pt thin film on TiO2-C core-shell structure and TiO2 encapsulated in carbon nanospheres as cathode catalyst in PEMFC, Fuel, 150, 645, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.002 · DOI
  7. Jiang, 2018, Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters based on an improved proton exchange membrane fuel cell analytical model, Energy Convers Manag, 164, 639, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.002 · DOI
  8. Park, 2015, Numerical simulations of a full-scale polymer electrolyte fuel cell with analysing systematic performance in an automotive application, Energy Convers Manag, 103, 623, 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.011 · DOI
  9. Shahgaldi, 2017, Development of a low temperature decal transfer method for the fabrication of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42, 11813, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.127 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zamel, 2013, Effective transport properties for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells - with a focus on the gas diffusion layer, Prog Energy Combust Sci, 39, 111, 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ghanbarian, 2018, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell flow field design criteria – application to parallel serpentine flow patterns, Energy Convers Manag, 166, 281, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.018 · DOI
  12. Shahgaldi, 2015, Improved carbon nanostructures as a novel catalyst support in the cathode side of PEMFC: a critical review, Carbon N Y, 94, 705, 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.055 · DOI
  13. Artyushkova, 2015, Structural correlations: design levers for performance and durability of catalyst layers, J Power Sources, 284, 631, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.135 · DOI
  14. Shahgaldi, 2017, Investigation of catalytic vs reactant transport effect of catalyst layers on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance, Fuel, 208, 321, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.035 · DOI
  15. Robson, 2013, A mechanistic study of 4-aminoantipyrine and iron derived non-platinum group metal catalyst on the oxygen reduction reaction, Electrochim Acta, 90, 656, 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.025 · DOI
  16. Stariha, 2016, PGM-free Fe-N-C catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction: catalyst layer design, J Power Sources, 326, 43, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.098 · DOI
  17. Ozden, 2017, Evaluation of sulfonated polysulfone/zirconium hydrogen phosphate composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells, Electrochim Acta, 256, 196, 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.002 · DOI
  18. Jeon, 2014, Temperature-dependent performance of the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell using short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 39, 11690, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.105 · DOI
  19. Luo, 2016, Water transport through short side chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer membranes, J Memb Sci, 520, 155, 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.021 · DOI
  20. Li, 2014, Porous polybenzimidazole membranes doped with phosphoric acid: preparation and application in high-temperature proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells, Energy Convers Manag, 85, 323, 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.052 · DOI
  21. Siracusano, 2014, Performance analysis of short-side-chain Aquivion® perfluorosulfonic acid polymer for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis, J Memb Sci, 466, 1, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.030 · DOI
  22. Breitwieser, 2017, A fully spray-coated fuel cell membrane electrode assembly using Aquivion ionomer with a graphene oxide/cerium oxide interlayer, J Power Sources, 351, 145, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.085 · DOI
  23. Lei, 2011, Low equivalent weight short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers in fuel cell cathode catalyst layers, J Power Sources, 196, 6168, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.024 · DOI
  24. Shahgaldi, 2018, The impact of short side chain ionomer on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance and durability, Appl Energy, 217, 295, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.154 · DOI
  25. Shahgaldi, 2018, Influence of ionomer structures and ratios on performance and degradation of PEM fuel cells, Electrochem Soc, 83, 71
  26. Xie, 2005, Functionally graded cathode catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J Electrochem Soc, 152, A1171, 10.1149/1.1904990 · DOI
  27. Kim, 2008, Effect of Nafion® gradient in dual catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 33, 2783, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.015 · DOI
  28. Chen, 2017, Gradient design of Pt/C ratio and Nafion content in cathode catalyst layer of PEMFCs, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42, 29960, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.229 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2012, Recent development of polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells, Chem Rev, 112, 2780, 10.1021/cr200035s · DOI
  30. Ozden Adnan, Alaefour Ibrahim E, Shahgaldi Samaneh, Li Xianguo, Ozgur Colpan C, Hamdullahpur Feridun. Chapter 2.28 - gas diffusion layers for PEM fuel cells: ex- and in-situ characterization. In: Exergetic, energetic and environmental dimensions. Acad H 1. Introduction, vol. 1972; 1973. http://doi.org/10.1016/B97.-0-12-813734-5.0004.-8. · DOI
  31. Zhao, 2018, Gas permeability of catalyzed electrodes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells, Appl Energy, 209, 203, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.087 · DOI
  32. Tamayol, 2012, Single phase through-plane permeability of carbon paper gas diffusion layers, J Power Sources, 204, 94, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.084 · DOI
  33. Ozden, 2018, Assessment of graphene as an alternative microporous layer material for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Fuel, 215, 726, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.109 · DOI
  34. Liang, 2014, Membrane electrode assembly with enhanced platinum utilization for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell prepared by catalyst coating membrane method, J Power Sources, 266, 107, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.014 · DOI
  35. Shahgaldi, 2018, Impact of manufacturing processes on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance, Appl Energy, 225, 1022, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.086 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sasikumar, 2004, Optimum Nafion content in PEM fuel cell electrodes, Electrochim Acta, 50, 601, 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.126 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Kim, 2010, The effects of Nafion® ionomer content in PEMFC MEAs prepared by a catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) spraying method, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 2119, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.058 · DOI
  38. Kreuer, 2008, Short-side-chain proton conducting perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers: why they perform better in PEM fuel cells, J Power Sources, 178, 499, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.011 · DOI
  39. Avcioglu, 2015, High performance PEM fuel cell catalyst layers with hydrophobic channels, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 40, 7720, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.004 · DOI
  40. Tseng, 2010, Effects of microstructure characteristics of gas diffusion layer and microporous layer on the performance of PEMFC, Energy Convers Manag, 51, 677, 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.011 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2006, A bi-functional micro-porous layer with composite carbon black for PEM fuel cells, J Power Sources, 162, 474, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.064 · DOI
  42. Ozden, 2018, A graphene-based microporous layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: characterization and performance comparison, Renew Energy, 126, 485, 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.065 · DOI
  43. You, 2012, Carbon-supported ultra-high loading Pt nanoparticle catalyst by controlled overgrowth of Pt: improvement of Pt utilization leads to enhanced direct methanol fuel cell performance, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 6880, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.103 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shahgaldi, S., Ozden, A., Li, X., & Hamdullahpur, F.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Li, Xianguo
ORCID
Venue
Energy Conversion and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
171
Pages
1476-1486
ISSN
0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078
OpenAlex
W2809901194
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Energy Conversion and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario-China Research and Innovation Fund
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Automotive Partnership Canada (APCPJ417858 - 11)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
cathode catalyst layer, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, platinum utilization, catalyst layer microstructure, air permeability, mass transfer, ionic resistance, ionomer loading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review